Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 4, 2015 at 14:53 vote accept Sparkler
Jan 30, 2015 at 18:44 history edited Sparkler CC BY-SA 3.0
added 61 characters in body
Jan 30, 2015 at 15:45 comment added LordStryker @Martin How were the results of Gaussian (the very first version) ever verified? Prof. John Pople simply got himself an army of grad students who worked overtime crunching numbers with paper, pencil and those old cumbersome calculators that had those huge levers you had to 'sha-shunk!' every time you wanted to perform an operation. I'm so glad I wasn't practicing comp. chem. during those times. ;)
Jan 30, 2015 at 15:36 answer added LordStryker timeline score: 4
Jan 29, 2015 at 16:33 comment added Martin - マーチン @Jori I consider computational chemistry to be a pen and paper method, at least in principle. The computer just does the job. While Gaussian might be suitable for a lot of things, i believe for the OP's intention it might not be the best fit. I might try to add an answer tomorrow, but I welcome anyone with more insight to be faster.
Jan 29, 2015 at 16:22 comment added Jori @Martin Isn't Gaussian a common tool to calculate such things? I think OP is referring to computational chemistry not pen and paper methods.
Jan 29, 2015 at 2:45 comment added Sparkler @Martin, I've updated the question.
Jan 29, 2015 at 2:45 history edited Sparkler CC BY-SA 3.0
added 72 characters in body
Jan 29, 2015 at 2:35 comment added Geoff Hutchison This will depend heavily on the accuracy you need and the size of the molecules. Binding one protein to another is very different than dealing with the benzene dimer.
Jan 29, 2015 at 2:23 comment added Martin - マーチン Are you only referring to pen and paper methods, or are you also interested in experimental procedures? It would probably be helpful if you could give some examples of the molecules (and bonds) you are looking into to estimate the size and what methods are suitable.
Jan 29, 2015 at 1:54 history asked Sparkler CC BY-SA 3.0