Skip to main content
Improved formatting and clarity. Added a tag.
Source Link
Mathew Mahindaratne
  • 42.1k
  • 29
  • 56
  • 111

I was looking at the description of the tetragonal group $$P 4_{2} 2 2$$ (No 93 in the International Tables of Crystallography) and there is one aspect that I do not understand. Namely, what is the convention and implications of choosing the origin point? For example, for the two fold rotation along the [110] plane, the origin is choosen to be $$(0, 0, \frac{1}{4})$$ and thus we should have the following transformation: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z + \frac{1}{2}$$.$$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z + \frac{1}{2}.$$

Why the origin is not set at (0, 0, 0)$(0, 0, 0)$ and then one would have: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z$$?$$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z?$$

I was looking at the description of the tetragonal group $$P 4_{2} 2 2$$ (No 93 in the International Tables of Crystallography) and there is one aspect that I do not understand. Namely, what is the convention and implications of choosing the origin point? For example, for the two fold rotation along the [110] plane, the origin is choosen to be $$(0, 0, \frac{1}{4})$$ and thus we should have the following transformation: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z + \frac{1}{2}$$.

Why the origin is not set at (0, 0, 0) and then one would have: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z$$?

I was looking at the description of the tetragonal group $$P 4_{2} 2 2$$ (No 93 in the International Tables of Crystallography) and there is one aspect that I do not understand. Namely, what is the convention and implications of choosing the origin point? For example, for the two fold rotation along the [110] plane, the origin is choosen to be $$(0, 0, \frac{1}{4})$$ and thus we should have the following transformation: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z + \frac{1}{2}.$$

Why the origin is not set at $(0, 0, 0)$ and then one would have: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z?$$

please don't use display style in titles
Link
orthocresol
  • 71.9k
  • 12
  • 249
  • 423

$$P $P 4_{2} 2 2$$22$ tetragonal group choice of origin for symmetry of special projections

Source Link

$$P 4_{2} 2 2$$ tetragonal group choice of origin for symmetry of special projections

I was looking at the description of the tetragonal group $$P 4_{2} 2 2$$ (No 93 in the International Tables of Crystallography) and there is one aspect that I do not understand. Namely, what is the convention and implications of choosing the origin point? For example, for the two fold rotation along the [110] plane, the origin is choosen to be $$(0, 0, \frac{1}{4})$$ and thus we should have the following transformation: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z + \frac{1}{2}$$.

Why the origin is not set at (0, 0, 0) and then one would have: $$x \rightarrow y, y \rightarrow x, z \rightarrow -z$$?