Skip to main content
added 38 characters in body
Source Link
user7951
user7951

$$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$$$$\frac{\mathrm dE}{\mathrm dx} = 0$$

$$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$$$$\frac{\mathrm d^2E}{\mathrm dx^2} \gt 0$$

The deeper valley to the right is the global minimum (at least as far as we can tell). It has the same mathematical properties, but the magnitude of the energy is lower - the valley is deeper.

To apply this concept to chemical systems, we have to change the potential energy that we use to describe the system. Gravitational potential energy is too weak to play much of a role at the molecular level. For large systems of reacting molecules, we instead look at one of several thermodynamic potential energies. The one we choose depends on which state variables are constant. For macroscopic chemical reactions, there is usually a constant number of particles, constant temperature, and either constant pressure or volume (NPT or NVT), and so we use the Gibbs Free Energy (G$G$ for NPT systems) or the Helmholtz Free Energy (A$A$ for NVT systems).

If we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable - we can calculate whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

In your example using methane gas, we can look at Gibbs free energy for the reactants and products and decide that the products are more thermodynamically stable than the reactants, and therefore methane gas in the presence of oxygen at 1 atm atm and 298 K K is thermodynamically unstable.

$$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$$

$$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$$

The deeper valley to the right is the global minimum (at least as far as we can tell). It has the same mathematical properties, but the magnitude of the energy is lower - the valley is deeper.

To apply this concept to chemical systems, we have to change the potential energy that we use to describe the system. Gravitational potential energy is too weak to play much of a role at the molecular level. For large systems of reacting molecules, we instead look at one of several thermodynamic potential energies. The one we choose depends on which state variables are constant. For macroscopic chemical reactions, there is usually a constant number of particles, constant temperature, and either constant pressure or volume (NPT or NVT), and so we use the Gibbs Free Energy (G for NPT systems) or the Helmholtz Free Energy (A for NVT systems).

If we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable - we can calculate whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

In your example using methane gas, we can look at Gibbs free energy for the reactants and products and decide that the products are more thermodynamically stable than the reactants, and therefore methane gas in the presence of oxygen at 1 atm and 298 K is thermodynamically unstable.

$$\frac{\mathrm dE}{\mathrm dx} = 0$$

$$\frac{\mathrm d^2E}{\mathrm dx^2} \gt 0$$

The deeper valley to the right is the global minimum (at least as far as we can tell). It has the same mathematical properties, but the magnitude of the energy is lower the valley is deeper.

To apply this concept to chemical systems, we have to change the potential energy that we use to describe the system. Gravitational potential energy is too weak to play much of a role at the molecular level. For large systems of reacting molecules, we instead look at one of several thermodynamic potential energies. The one we choose depends on which state variables are constant. For macroscopic chemical reactions, there is usually a constant number of particles, constant temperature, and either constant pressure or volume (NPT or NVT), and so we use the Gibbs Free Energy ($G$ for NPT systems) or the Helmholtz Free Energy ($A$ for NVT systems).

If we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable we can calculate whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

In your example using methane gas, we can look at Gibbs free energy for the reactants and products and decide that the products are more thermodynamically stable than the reactants, and therefore methane gas in the presence of oxygen at 1 atm and 298 K is thermodynamically unstable.

Noice answer
Source Link
M.A.R.
  • 10.8k
  • 19
  • 72
  • 95

$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$$$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$$

$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$$$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$$

$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$

$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$

$$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$$

$$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$$

added some equations, minor text corrections
Source Link
thomij
  • 10.5k
  • 34
  • 62

We call the first valley a local minimum in the potential energy surface. In mathematical terms, this means that the first derivative of potential energy with respect to position is zero,:

$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$

and the second derivative is positive -:

$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$

In other words, the slope is zero and the shape is concave up (or convex).

Each of these is a thermodynamic potential under the appropriate conditions, which means that it does the same thing that gravitational potential energy does: it predictsallows us to predict where the system will go, if it gets the opportunity to do so.

So, ifIf we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable - we can figure outcalculate whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

However, you would have to wait a very long time for methane to react without some outside help. The reason is that the transition states along the lowest-energy reaction path have a much higher thermodynamic potential energy than the average kinetic energy of the reactants. The reactants are kinetically trapped - or stable just because they are stuck in a local minimum. The minimum amount of energy that you would need to provide in the form of heat (a lit match) to overcome that barrier is called the activation energy.

We call the first valley a local minimum in the potential energy surface. In mathematical terms, this means that the first derivative of potential energy with respect to position is zero, and the second derivative is positive - the slope is zero and the shape is concave up (or convex).

Each of these is a thermodynamic potential under the appropriate conditions, which means that it does the same thing that gravitational potential energy does: it predicts where the system will go, if it gets the opportunity to do so.

So, if we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable - we can figure out whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

However, you would have to wait a very long time for methane to react without some outside help. The reason is that the transition states along the lowest-energy reaction path have a much higher thermodynamic potential energy than the average kinetic energy of the reactants. The reactants are kinetically trapped - or stable just because they are stuck in a local minimum. The minimum amount of energy that you need to provide in the form of heat (a lit match) to overcome that barrier is called the activation energy.

We call the first valley a local minimum in the potential energy surface. In mathematical terms, this means that the first derivative of potential energy with respect to position is zero:

$\frac{dE}{dx} = 0$

and the second derivative is positive:

$\frac{d^2E}{dx^2} > 0$

In other words, the slope is zero and the shape is concave up (or convex).

Each of these is a thermodynamic potential under the appropriate conditions, which means that it does the same thing that gravitational potential energy does: it allows us to predict where the system will go, if it gets the opportunity to do so.

If we can describe the thermodynamic potential energy of a system in different states, we can figure out whether a transition between two states is thermodynamically favorable - we can calculate whether the potential energy would increase, decrease, or stay the same.

However, you would have to wait a very long time for methane to react without some outside help. The reason is that the transition states along the lowest-energy reaction path have a much higher thermodynamic potential energy than the average kinetic energy of the reactants. The reactants are kinetically trapped - or stable just because they are stuck in a local minimum. The minimum amount of energy that you would need to provide in the form of heat (a lit match) to overcome that barrier is called the activation energy.

minor text changes
Source Link
thomij
  • 10.5k
  • 34
  • 62
Loading
Source Link
thomij
  • 10.5k
  • 34
  • 62
Loading