Skip to main content
added 29 characters in body
Source Link
andselisk
  • 38.5k
  • 14
  • 133
  • 223

Answer: BothBoth reactions involving Cu+$\ce{Cu+}$ have the lowest and highest Standard Electrode Potentialsstandard electrode potentials, respectively. Thus, Cu+$\ce{Cu+}$ has to be the strongest oxidizing/reducing agents, and therefore it undergoes disproportionation.

Because the formation of Cu$\ce{Cu}$ has a higher SEP than Cu+,$\ce{Cu+},$ it is more likely to get reduced and therefore is a better oxidizing agent - NOTnot a better reducing agent - than Cu+$\ce{Cu+}$ (which is more likely to get oxidized as it has a higher SEP).

Answer: Both reactions involving Cu+ have the lowest and highest Standard Electrode Potentials respectively. Thus, Cu+ has to be the strongest oxidizing/reducing agents, and therefore it undergoes disproportionation.

Because the formation of Cu has a higher SEP than Cu+, it is more likely to get reduced and therefore is a better oxidizing agent - NOT a better reducing agent - than Cu+ (which is more likely to get oxidized as it has a higher SEP).

Both reactions involving $\ce{Cu+}$ have the lowest and highest standard electrode potentials, respectively. Thus, $\ce{Cu+}$ has to be the strongest oxidizing/reducing agents, and therefore it undergoes disproportionation.

Because the formation of $\ce{Cu}$ has a higher SEP than $\ce{Cu+},$ it is more likely to get reduced and therefore is a better oxidizing agent not a better reducing agent than $\ce{Cu+}$ (which is more likely to get oxidized as it has a higher SEP).

Source Link

Answer: Both reactions involving Cu+ have the lowest and highest Standard Electrode Potentials respectively. Thus, Cu+ has to be the strongest oxidizing/reducing agents, and therefore it undergoes disproportionation.

Because the formation of Cu has a higher SEP than Cu+, it is more likely to get reduced and therefore is a better oxidizing agent - NOT a better reducing agent - than Cu+ (which is more likely to get oxidized as it has a higher SEP).