Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 21, 2019 at 21:44 comment added Karl @ComFreek Careful, other people have tried to find such connections, and it didn't exactly prove fruitful ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_C._A._Boeyens is a hilarious example. ;-)
Jan 20, 2019 at 22:54 comment added John Gowers @ComFreek I think this is not so much a deep connection between algebra and chemistry as between algebra and graph theory. And then there is a (shallow) connection between chemistry and graph theory via diagrams for covalently-bonded molecules.
Jan 20, 2019 at 8:33 comment added ComFreek @NicolauSakerNeto I also found big resemblance in the Cayley graph of the free group with 2 generators. As a non-chemist, but someone with interest in maths, I wonder whether there is any deeper connection between algebra and chemistry. If someone has any pointers for me, I am happy to take them.
Jan 19, 2019 at 23:54 comment added Nicolau Saker Neto It would seem I have found the structure for the maximal pentadecane in a completely different setting. I wonder if there's anything interesting that pops up from that unusual connection... Actually, it seems that if you take the infinite fractal and assign a single carbon atom to be a particular region size, then circle all regions of that size, you can recover the whole infinite family of maximal alkanes!
Jan 19, 2019 at 17:56 comment added mykhal Preferred IUPAC names is a good concept, but “tetrakis(tri-tert-butylmethyl)methane” is somewhat shorter and clearer ;)
Jan 19, 2019 at 16:25 comment added Nandakumar U K Yes, i got it as C53H108!!!
Jan 19, 2019 at 15:27 history edited user7951 CC BY-SA 4.0
image added
Jan 19, 2019 at 15:24 comment added Karl @matt_black It replaces any of the 12 Me groups of tetra-tBu-methane by tBu, so it's $\ce{C5 + 12 * C4H9 = C53H108}$. Too many isomers to even think about. ;-)
Jan 19, 2019 at 15:12 comment added matt_black My head hurts trying to parse that name. Could you draw it and give its simple overall formula? Then I can look it up on the list given in answers to chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/16135/81
Jan 19, 2019 at 14:24 vote accept Nandakumar U K
Jan 19, 2019 at 14:12 comment added Karl @Loong make that definitely. ;-)
Jan 19, 2019 at 14:08 comment added user7951 @IvanNeretin Agreed, the inner C–C bonds would probably be stretched to more than 2 Å. That’s why I wrote “largest theoretical structure”.
Jan 19, 2019 at 13:33 comment added Ivan Neretin I believe this thing is much too crowded to survive, but then again, that's not what the question was about. Other than that, you are right.
Jan 19, 2019 at 13:25 history answered user7951 CC BY-SA 4.0