New answers tagged

3

You have mixed up Avogadro number $N_0$ with Avogadro constant $N_\mathrm{A}$, and used the constant to define itself, which is incorrect mathematically. Analytical form of your suggestion is as follows: $$N_\mathrm{A} = N_0\cdot\pu{mol^-1} \label{eqn:1}\tag{1}$$ $$\implies \pu{1 mol^-1} = N_\mathrm{A}\cdot N_0^{-1} \label{eqn:2}\tag{2}$$ Plugging \eqref{eqn:...


Top 50 recent answers are included