New answers tagged


Those are the same, just shown in a different conformation and a different view. As user55119 points out in the comments, the numbering went awry (in fructose, #2 is the anomeric carbon in the ring form, or the carbonyl carbon in the linear form). Sucrose has no reducing "ends", which it would have if fructose would link via the #5 carbon. If you ...

Top 50 recent answers are included