For most lanthanide metals$^{[1]}$, the stable oxidation state is III. The general electronic structure$^{[2]}$ is $$\ce{[Xe] 4f^{0}^{-14} 5s^2 5p^6 5d^{0}^{-1} 6s^2}.$$

Elements that have the *d*-electron are La, Ce, Gd, and Lu. Furthermore, the *f*-subshell is considered relatively stable in states $$f^0, f^7, \text{and} f^{14}.$$

We can conclude that La, Gd, and also Lu easily form $\ce{E^3+}$ ions. Yet, as would be predicted by this easy approach, we would also see $$\ce{Sm+, Tm+ (f^7 \ and \ f^14 ), \\ Pr^5+, Dy^5+ (f^0 \ and \ f^7)}.$$

Why is this not the case?

---
$^{[1]}$ Ce, Pr, and Tb also have the oxidation state IV. Eu and Tm have the additional state II.

$^{[2]}$ Ordering (relative energy) changes with the number of electrons.

---

I strongly recommend having a look at these questions:

 - [Howcome orbitals become 'core-like' when electrons are removed?](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/53713/howcome-orbitals-become-core-like-when-electrons-are-removed)
 - [What is meant by 'electrons of like/unlike rotation'?](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/53714/what-is-meant-by-electrons-of-like-unlike-rotation)
 - [What's up with this quarter / three-quarter rule?](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/53715/whats-up-with-this-quarter-three-quarter-rule)

---
Original topic: [Predominance of III oxidation state for lanthanides](https://chemistry.stackexchange.com/questions/53605/predominance-of-iii-oxidation-state-for-lanthanides)