Compare the SN2 reactivity order for:

enter image description here

The benzyl group stabilises the transition state of SN2 reaction using the π system of the benzene ring for conjugation with the p- orbital of the electrophilic carbon which is electron deficient. (reference: Clayden, page 341)

So in my opinion, groups increasing the electron density of the ring should make the SN2 reaction go faster as compared to groups decreasing it.

Thus the order should be $2 > 3 > 1 > 4$ but the answer given in my worksheet is the exact opposite of this. I would like to know the reason for that and the flaw in my reasoning.

This is what I found in March:

Holtz and Stock showed that electron-withdrawing groups increase the rate of SN2 reactions. This can be ascribed to stabilization of the transition state by withdrawal of some of the electron density.

I find this contradictory to the content given in Clayden that the TS is "electron deficient". In March its also given that for alkyl groups at para position the Baker Nathan order is followed (methyl > ethyl > t-butyl). (Hyperconjugation is most in methyl so it increases electron density of the ring) (Another apparent contradiction)

So how exactly do I determine the effect of the p-substituents in SN2.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.