0
$\begingroup$

We know that metals can form complexes with different coordination numbers, but I was told that certain metals have a greater probability to have a certain coordination number.

But I was not able to find any such list that correlates a metal with its most favorable coordination number.

As an example, I guess $\ce{Fe^3+}$ forms complexes with coordination number 6, but can I actually predict the coordination number in a reaction or not?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Mithoron, Avnish Kabaj, aventurin, A.K., Tyberius May 1 '18 at 14:34

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2
$\begingroup$

Summary of molecular orbital theory for coordination compounds-Ligand Field Theory

Molecular Orbital Diagram can explain what you are looking for. First, you choose the geometries you expected to have with corresponding metal cation and ligands. You need to do this since different complex structures will have different more and less energetic d-orbitals.

Second, do MO diagrams for all geometries, and compare the energies, or more properly, stabilities of compounds. Looking at antibonding interactions with ligands you can even predict which bonds of the ligands are becoming more vulnerable to attack.

Additionally, there are such lists in inorganic chemistry textbooks in general. Ferric ion; for instance, can make stable 7-ligand-complex. However, ligands are also very crucial on this aspect and there is ongoing research, like this one:

8 coordinate ferric ion

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.