I know that cyclopropyl methyl carbocation is exceptionally stable compared to say, benzyl carbocation.

But I want to know how stable is cyclobutyl methyl carbocation compared to say, tertiary/secondary carbocations? Or, will it go rearrangement breaking the ring?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ DOI: 10.1021/ja01473a028 <BR> DOI: 10.1002/anie.196706661 thesis.library.caltech.edu/656/1/Silver_ms_1959.pdf <BR> thesis.library.caltech.edu/4757/1/Cox_ef_1955.pdf The original literature arises from these two theses. $\endgroup$ – Uncle Al Mar 29 '14 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ Did you mean a 3-methyl cyclopropene carbocation? I believe that's the aromatic compound that is exceptionally stable (read: still not that stable) - a regular methyl cyclopropane would be very strained, and with a charge I think it would be even less so. $\endgroup$ – qwersjc Mar 30 '14 at 3:15
  • $\begingroup$ @qwersjc No I am not talking about that. $\endgroup$ – evil999man Mar 30 '14 at 10:12

George Olah and coworkers have examined the cyclobutyldicyclopropylmethyl and the cyclobutylmethyl cation.

(Yes, this is an awfully short answer and I can't really provide more information on the topic.)

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Doesn't that require to buy the content? $\endgroup$ – evil999man Mar 30 '14 at 10:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Awesome Yes, unless you have access via a university or research facility. $\endgroup$ – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Mar 30 '14 at 10:58
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I don't have access. Could you just tell whether it will go rearrangement breaking ring or not? $\endgroup$ – evil999man Mar 30 '14 at 11:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.