For example, given a reaction

$\ce{NaCl -> Na+ + Cl-}$

and its $Ksp$ value, I know that you can set up $$Ksp\; =\; \left[ \ce{Na^{+}} \right]\left[ \ce{Cl^{-}} \right]$$ and solve from there.

My question is why do you not put $\ce{[NaCl]}$ in the denominator, as isn't that part of the equilibrium expression also?


1 Answer 1


The reason why $K_{sp}$ does not include $[\ce{NaCl}]$ is because it is solid:

$$\ce{NaCl(s) -> Na+ (aq) + Cl- (aq)}$$

The equilibrium constant $K$ would include $[\ce{NaCl}]$:


However, the concentration of sodium chloride in solid sodium chloride is constant, thus we can write an equation for the observed rate constant that is based only on the variable concentrations. $K_{sp}$ is this observed rated constant:


  • $\begingroup$ But since $\ce{NaCl}$ is soluble shouldn't you write it as $Na\mbox{C}l_{\left( aq \right)}$? $\endgroup$
    – 1110101001
    Commented Mar 13, 2014 at 3:45
  • $\begingroup$ But then we're not talking about sodium chloride's solubility product constant, we're talking about its dissociation constant. Also, there is a limit to sodium chloride's solubility in water (359 g/L according to Wikipedia) $\endgroup$
    – Ben Norris
    Commented Mar 13, 2014 at 10:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.