Consider this compound:

enter image description here

I am able to identify the base chain as propane. But, I am having trouble naming the other side of the chain. Will it be named as:

  1. 2-(isopropoxy)propane,
  2. 2-[(propan-2-yl)oxy]propane, or,
  3. 2-(2-propoxy)propane

What is the preferred IUPAC way for such a naming of isomeric alkyl groups?

  • $\begingroup$ why is option 2 preferred over "1-methylethyloxy"? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 4, 2018 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ @EashaanGodbole I think "1-methylethyloxy" is wrong because there is no principal chain (i.e. no "ethane"/"propane"/etc.) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 5, 2018 at 1:43
  • $\begingroup$ @GaurangTandon I asked because we used "1-methylethyl" and "1,1-dimethylethyl" for isopropyl and tert-butyl respectively as the point of connection of the side chain is often considered the "1'" carbon. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 5, 2018 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ @EashaanGodbole As far as I can guess this will lead you to the common name of this compound, diisopropyl ether $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 5, 2018 at 12:39

3 Answers 3


According to Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book) (P-, the preferred prefix for the substituent $\ce{(CH3)2CH-O\bond{-}}$ is 'propan-2-yloxy'. Both 'isopropoxy' and '1-methylethoxy' remain permissible in general nomenclature.

Correspondingly, the PIN of the symmetrical ether $\ce{[(CH3)2CH]2O}$ is 2-[(propan-2-yl)oxy]propane.

PIN of diisopropyl ether

I'm quite sure the double parentheses are required based on other similar examples given in the Blue Book, but am not 100% sure of the rationale for it and would be grateful if somebody could confirm that. I'm thinking one set comes from P- as 'propan-2-yloxy' is a compound substituent, and one more comes from P- to separate the locant '2' in 'propan-2-yl' from the remainder of the name, but don't quote me on that.

  • $\begingroup$ You may have found another bug, e.g. 2-chloro-4-(5-chloropyridin-2-yloxy)pyridine (P- was fixed to 2-chloro-4-[(5-chloropyridin-2-yl)oxy]pyridine in the errata. $\endgroup$
    – mykhal
    Commented Aug 2, 2018 at 19:29
  • $\begingroup$ @mykhal Mmhmm, there is a similar erratum on pg704. I’m not sure whether anything else is actually wrong, though. Maybe the prefix should be named ‘(propan-2-yl)oxy’ instead of ‘propan-2-yloxy’. However, the entire section on alkoxy prefixes doesn’t have that set of parentheses (P-, so I’m inclined to believe they’re right. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 3, 2018 at 4:41

Maybe not preferred officially in this case, very nice IUPAC names are the symmetry-based ones (multiplicative name or ether functional class names):

  • 2,2′-oxydipropane
  • di(propan-2-yl) ether
  • diisopropyl ether

(One might be tempted to replace "di" with "bis", but it should not be the case for this simple substituent.)

2-[(propan-2-yl)oxy]propane PIN name in orthocresol's answer is correct. For symmetrically characteristic-group-disubstituted derivatives, above mentioned name type is used, e.g. $\ce{HO-C(CH3)2-O-C(CH3)2-OH}$ 2,2′-oxydi(propan-2-ol).


The backbone has 3 carbons so it is -propane. On the middle carbon (carbon number 2), there is a branch consisting of an oxygen atom and further branching off to three methyl groups. Three is prop- and oxygen is -oxy, so we have propoxy-. So your second option is discarded.

So currently we have $\text{O-CH}_3\text{-CH}_3$ with the $\text{CH}_3$ next to the $\text{O}$ branching off to a methyl group. In other words, this $\text{CH}_3$ is in the middle, with only one branch, so we call it iso-.

As said previously, the carbon number 2 of the backbone has a branch, so the IUPAC name for the compound is 2-isopropoxypropane (your first option) and is more commonly known as diisopropyl ether.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that, according to current (2013) IUPAC recommendations, the prefix ‘isopropoxy’ is retained for use only in general nomenclature. $\endgroup$
    – user7951
    Commented Feb 2, 2018 at 17:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.