5
$\begingroup$

Is the following sequence of reactions correct?

$$\ce{CH2CH2 ->[][\ce{NH3},\,\ce{Na}] NaHC=CHNa}$$

$$\ce{NaCH=CHNa + 2CH3CH2Br-> CH3CH2CH=CHCH2CH3}$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Have a look at the Birch reduction. $\endgroup$
    – tschoppi
    Mar 1, 2014 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ @tschoppi If it wasn't ethene but methylpropene and a branched hydrocarbon, I'd suggest sulfuric acid or hydrofluoric acid to achieve the alkylation. But the double bond would be gone then. $\endgroup$ Mar 1, 2014 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ @KlausWarzecha Well, after seeing ($\ce{NH3}$, $\ce{Na}$) I was thinking Birch and nothing happening afterwards... I didn't realize that the goal of this might be "alkylation of ethene" ;) $\endgroup$
    – tschoppi
    Mar 1, 2014 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ @tschoppi No problem! $\endgroup$ Mar 1, 2014 at 22:14

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

No, because for ethene, $\mathrm{p}K_\text{a} = 44$. You won't be able to abstract even one proton.

Maybe, you were thinking in ethyne ($\ce{HC#CH})$? In that case, you are right! The bis-alkylation would work with sodium amide as a base!

But is the simultaneous abstraction of both protons the most plausible reaction then?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.