5
$\begingroup$

Is the following sequence of reactions correct?

$$\ce{CH2CH2 ->[][\ce{NH3},\,\ce{Na}] NaHC=CHNa}$$

$$\ce{NaCH=CHNa + 2CH3CH2Br-> CH3CH2CH=CHCH2CH3}$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Have a look at the Birch reduction. $\endgroup$ – tschoppi Mar 1 '14 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ @tschoppi If it wasn't ethene but methylpropene and a branched hydrocarbon, I'd suggest sulfuric acid or hydrofluoric acid to achieve the alkylation. But the double bond would be gone then. $\endgroup$ – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Mar 1 '14 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ @KlausWarzecha Well, after seeing ($\ce{NH3}$, $\ce{Na}$) I was thinking Birch and nothing happening afterwards... I didn't realize that the goal of this might be "alkylation of ethene" ;) $\endgroup$ – tschoppi Mar 1 '14 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ @tschoppi No problem! $\endgroup$ – Klaus-Dieter Warzecha Mar 1 '14 at 22:14
3
$\begingroup$

No, because for ethene, $\mathrm{p}K_\text{a} = 44$. You won't be able to abstract even one proton.

Maybe, you were thinking in ethyne ($\ce{HC#CH})$? In that case, you are right! The bis-alkylation would work with sodium amide as a base!

But is the simultaneous abstraction of both protons the most plausible reaction then?

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.