While going through old notes, in relation to the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model, it states that the stretching frequency for $\ce{N2}$ to the group 8 transition metals ($\nu(\ce{NN})$) proceeds as:

\begin{array}{cc} \hline \text{Compound} & \nu,~\pu{cm-1} \\ \hline \ce{[(SiP3)Fe(N2)]-} & 1920 \\ \ce{[(SiP3)Ru(N2)]-} & 1960 \\ \ce{[(SiP3)Os(N2)]-} & 1931 \\ \hline \end{array}

However, the notes fail to elaborate further.

I would have perhaps assumed that the trend was due to increasing size of the $\ce{3d -> 4d -> 5d}$ orbitals and thus increased pi-donation causing a weaker bond and thus lower frequency, however, this does not fit the trend observed. Thus leads me to my question: how does the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson model relate to the observed trend?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.