This question already has an answer here:

What is the structure of SO2? I have seen two different ways the Lewis Structure is written: Single and Double Two double bonds

The formal charges of the SO2 with the single bond and a double bond is larger than the SO2 with two double bonds. So I would assume that the one with two double bonds is the correct structure. But chemistry books I have looked at (Zumdahl Edition 5 and 7) says that it is the opposite.

Which is the correct Lewis Structure?


marked as duplicate by Mithoron, andselisk, Todd Minehardt, ron, Nilay Ghosh Dec 9 '17 at 4:30

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ There is such thing as a "correct Lewis structure." $\endgroup$ – Zhe Dec 8 '17 at 18:55

The Lewis structure most closely resembling reality consists of two resonance structures: the first one posted in the question and its mirror image. The reason is that the octet rule is observed this way (no hybridization of d-orbitals for main group chemistry necessary or possible) as well as the symmetry of the molecule: the two bonds are identical.

  • $\begingroup$ I had the notion that sulfur had expanded valence electrons. So why wouldn't sulfur be able to use them and make the formal charges get to 0 for all three atoms? Also, how does the molecule have symmetry? The bonds aren't identical, one is a single bond and the other is a double bond. $\endgroup$ – Hawkeye Dec 8 '17 at 19:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The identical bonds are a physically observable reality. Expanded valence electrons are an outdated concept refuted by modern quantum chemistry. $\endgroup$ – TAR86 Dec 8 '17 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ How does sulfur make a molecule such as Sulfur Hexafluoride in modern quantum chemistry, since expanded valence electrons are outdated? $\endgroup$ – Hawkeye Dec 8 '17 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Hawkeye check out molecular orbital theory. You can easily hold sulfur hexafluoride together without using "outer $d$ orbitals". $\endgroup$ – Oscar Lanzi Dec 8 '17 at 23:41

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.