0
$\begingroup$

Trends for electron affinity going across the group increases negatively.

Does this mean Noble gases' electron negativity is more negative than halogens?

I'm confuse here.

Noble gases should have a positive electron affinity as adding an electron would make it unstable and thus, will not form.

But for halogens, their attraction for that 1 electron to fill up the $\mathrm{p}$ subshell is very strong.

But according to the theory that electron affinity increase negatively across the period, does this theory has an exception of noble gases?

Next, what about $\ce{Be}$ and $\ce{Mg}$? Their electron affinities are not negative.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Not exceptions, but see, theories say that going $L→R$ electron affinity increases up to halogens.

For the noble gases, $\Delta_\mathrm{eg}H$ is positive (energy required). While electron affinity is $0$. Which implies no tendency to lose electrons.

For $\ce{Be}$, the small size and nuclear charge are responsible, which is related to $\ce{Mg}$ due to a diagonal relationship.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Be and Mg are not diagonally related, and in any event diagonal relationships do not work for electron affinities. Mg lacks an exothermic electron affinity because like Be, it has a closed valence shell and an electron would have to be added to a much higher-energy orbital. $\endgroup$ Oct 19 '20 at 13:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.