1
$\begingroup$

The beryllium iodide $\ce{BeI2}$ as covalent compound is apolar, and thus, it should be water non-soluble. However, it is. Making a research on the web, I learned it is just in the middle of being ionic. Dos it happen with the $\ce{MgI2}$ of $\ce{MgF2}$ as well? I usually explain the following to my students:

  • Solubitity "general" rule: "Similar dissolves similar".
  • Solubitity is also affected by differences in electronegativity and bonding polarity.
  • Solubility is also affected by the capability to displace charge and solvation (that is, intermolecular forces also apply to some extent).
  • As a practical rule, we can consider ionic compounds those formed by G1 or G2 with G16 or G17, but this rule has exceptions, like the rules of electronic configurations.

Is all stuff correct? Solubility in water of $\ce{BeH2}$ and $\ce{XeF2}$ can be also considered with these rules?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Mithoron, Nilay Ghosh, airhuff, bon, Tyberius Nov 19 '17 at 21:57

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ General rules have the general tendency of falling apart in a generally rapid manner. $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 19 '17 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ Be is very small, iodine very big, no wonder Be2+ prefers to be bound to water. $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Nov 19 '17 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ Just because something is covalent and has zero (permanent) dipole moment does not mean It's doomed to water insolubility. There is zero permanent dipole in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexamethylenetetramine, yet this is soluble in water up to almost a 1:1 mass ratio. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Lanzi Nov 19 '17 at 19:23
  • $\begingroup$ I know, similar dissolves the similar thumb rule is not general, as the principle of electronic configurations. I just came to remember the Usanovich theory, so to solvatate something, we have to be able to displace charge...Any way, the rules are to be improved... $\endgroup$ – riemannium Nov 19 '17 at 19:26

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.