2
$\begingroup$

I have been reading an abstract of a paper for a couple of minutes (reference below) but I cannot understand a piece of it. The abstract:

The ionization state and $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ of the inhibitor 6,8-dimethyl-N5-deazapterin bound to the recombinant human dihydrofolate reductase (rhH2folate reductase) complex with NADPH was determined by a spectrofluorimetric method. The excitation spectra for bound ligand as a function of pH from 6.1 to 9.7 indicated it was the same cationic form as for unbound ligand, which is protonated on N3. However, the lower limit for the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ of the bound form was determined to be 9.1, a value about pH 2.5 higher than that for free ligand, indicating that ligand bound to the enzyme is protonated at neutral pH. The excitation spectra for bound ligand as a function of pH were generated by computer simulation by employing corrections for the pH dependence of the proportion of bound ligand (variable $K_\mathrm d$; ligand-dissociation constant) and taking account of the different $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ values for bound and unbound forms. A plot of $K_\mathrm d$ values against pH showed a bell-shaped curve indicating that 6,8-dimethyl-N5-deazapterin bound to rhH2folate reductase. NADPH to form a ternary complex of ionised enzyme with protonated ligand and/or protonated enzyme with unprotonated ligand; the spectrofluorimetric results are consistent with the first alternative.

I made the not-understandable part (for me) in bold. Could some one help me to understand how do the previous sentences help to indicate to this sentence? Maybe I am missing something in the previous sentences.


Jeong, S.-S.; Gready, J. E. Ionization state and pka of pterin-analogue ligands bound to dihydrofolate reductase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 221 (3), 1055–1062. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18824.x.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The sentence immediately before the bolded one indicates that the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ value of the ligand bound to the enzyme was determined to be $9.1$. It also indicates that the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ value o the free ligand is 2.5 logarithmic units less, i.e. $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a(\ce{Lig}) \approx 6.6$.

The human cell is well-buffered to ensure that the pH stays within a very narrow range. There are enough buffering compounds around, that we never need to use any Henderson-Hasselbalch equation or other difficult calculation methods to determine the protonation state of a given compound. We can simply examine its $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ value; if that is lower than the cell’s pH value, the compound is deprotonated. In all other cases, it is not.

The $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ value of the free ligand indicates it should be deprotonated in the cell. However, upon binding to the protein with the $\mathrm pK_\mathrm a$ value rising by $2.5$ logarithmic units, the ligand suddenly becomes protonated. This is what the bolded sentence implies.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Aah ok, thank you a lot! so protonated here means simply, not ionized, right? $\endgroup$ – Mohammed Noureldin Nov 12 '17 at 15:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MohammedNoureldin Protonated means that the most acidic proton has not been lost. Whether this corresponds to a neutral structure (e.g. $\ce{HCN}$) or to a cationic one (e.g. $\ce{NH4+}$) I cannot say without checking the structure. $\endgroup$ – Jan Nov 12 '17 at 15:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.