3
$\begingroup$

Why is the excitation energy different from the energy difference between the orbital from which a electron is excited to the orbital in which the electron is excited to? Consider that the transition mainly consists of the above specified 2 orbitals only. Do comment if I need to add additional information to the question.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

Just look at the Hartree-Fock equations that define orbitals $$ \hat{F} \psi_{i}(1) = \varepsilon_{i} \psi_{i}(1) \, , \quad i = 1, 2, \dotsc \, , $$ where $\hat{F}$, the Fock operator, is given by $$ \hat{F} = \hat{H}_{\mathrm{core}} + \sum\limits_{j=1}^{n} \big( \hat{J}_{j} - \hat{K}_{j} \big) \, . $$ First, notice that summation in the series goes over the number of electrons, or, in other words, over all occupied orbitals. Secondly, note that $\hat{J}_{i} \psi_{i}(1) = \hat{K}_{i} \psi_{i}(1)$, and thus, the Fock operator for the $i$-th occupied orbital does not include the Coulomb and exchange contribution from the $i$-th occupied orbital itself. The so-called self-interaction is perfectly canceled in the HF model and this is a rather nice feature of this model.

It also means that an electron in each and every occupied orbital "feels" only $n - 1$ electrons in other occupied orbitals, while an electron in a virtual orbital "feels" all $n$ electrons in all occupied orbitals without any exceptions. As a result a virtual orbital is useful only for describing the system in which an electron was added to it but none of the occupied orbitals were depopulated, so that electron in the previously unoccupied orbital still "feels" all $n$ electrons.

Now think about exciting an electron from an occupied orbital $\psi_o$ to a virtual one $\psi_u$. Before excitation an electron in $\psi_u$ would "feel" all $n$ electrons, but after excitation it "feels" only $n - 1$ electrons since $\psi_u$ is not unoccupied anymore. That is clearly a contradiction. So, indeed, $\varepsilon_u - \varepsilon_o$ should not be used to calculate the excitation energy, because exciting an electron from $\psi_o$ to $\psi_u$ leaves behind a hole in $\psi_o$ and $\varepsilon_u$ describes the case when one puts an electron into $\psi_u$ but does not remove one from $\psi_o$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.