My teacher poured water over some soil and said that the air bubbles prove that soil contains air. However I was wondering if there is a more direct approach to proving that soil contains air, like explicitly separating one from the other. Is there an experiment like this? Also, how would the air look like? I've never exactly "seen" air, so how does one know when the air has been separated? Maybe by making it a liquid (liquid nitrogen)?

  • $\begingroup$ Well you see, soil is a porous mixture of a lot of things. Porous substances have small pockets in them. Air fills those pockets. So you can't remove the air from soil, unless you take the soil sample to an airtight box of course. $\endgroup$ Sep 9, 2017 at 16:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a great question. Not sure why it has down votes. $\endgroup$
    – Curt F.
    Sep 9, 2017 at 19:23
  • $\begingroup$ Gases spread to fill the container. If a substance has holes, air will fill it. $\endgroup$ Sep 10, 2017 at 3:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CurtF. I have no idea why you'd think so. $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    Sep 10, 2017 at 23:37

1 Answer 1


Your teacher's method of pouring water over soil is an excellent way to demonstrate that there is air in the soil. If you're still unconvinced, it's possible to directly separate the air out. Here's how:

You fill a vacuum chamber with your soil. All of it. So it's all soil and no free space is left. Now you just pump the air to a different chamber. There are several ways to do it so I will not elaborate on the mechanics. This method extracts the air from the intergranular porosity (i.e. the space between the soil grains) to your other container.

Also, how would the air look like?

Well, it doesn't look like anything, because it is after all air. It is possible to liquefy it by cooling or compressing. It's also possible to measure the composition of the gas you extract out of it and see that it matches the composition of air. It will not be exact, depending on the soil. Some soils have decomposing organic matter (dead bacteria, dead plants, dead other things) so they might have slightly less oxygen and slightly more carbon dioxide, methane, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and a bunch of other things that usually also smell.

  • $\begingroup$ It would probably be better to have water on top of the soil as you evacuate. Then you can evacuate the air, and open the chamber again, no air in the soil. Otherwise, air will just enter the pores again at the same rate it left. A bonus is also that you can visually see when the air has been evacuated - "boiling" the water. Of course, if you have a really hard vacuum you need something else than water, since water will actually boil at room temperature somewhere down in the single mbars. $\endgroup$ Sep 11, 2017 at 8:09
  • $\begingroup$ As I said, I didn't want to go into the mechanics of it because there are many ways to do it, and it wasn't the point I was trying to make. $\endgroup$
    – Gimelist
    Sep 11, 2017 at 8:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.