3
$\begingroup$

I am learning about acid-base reactions and how to identify whether an acid is strong or not by looking at the conjugate base. The more stable a conjugate base the stronger the acid.

However, two of the factors that determine conjugate base stability seems contradictory to me.

  1. I understand the bigger the atom, the more stable the base so $\ce{HI}$ is more stable than $\ce{HF}$.
  2. The smaller the orbital the more stable the base. So $\ce{sp}$ is more stable than $\ce{sp^3}$.

Now why is a bigger atom more stable than a smaller one, but a smaller orbital more stable than a bigger orbital?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Mithoron, Todd Minehardt, ron, andselisk, M.A.R. ಠ_ಠ Aug 7 '17 at 4:47

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1
$\begingroup$

When we say that 'bigger the atom, more stable is the anion', we mean to say that the negative charge would be spread over a larger area. So, the interatomic repulsive forces would be spread over a large area, lowering the energy and stabilising the anion. Going down the group, the jump in size is large enough to compensate the decrease in electronegativity, so we use the 'size of atoms' argument to differenciate between different atoms in the same group.

Conversely, we use the 'size of orbital' argument to determine the basicity of the same atom but in different hybridisations. Hence, the size of the atom would be same and the smaller size of the sp orbital would mean that it would be better attracted by the nucleus making the anion more stable.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.