6
$\begingroup$

Please don't say sodium tetraborate decahydrate since that is not the real composition of borax.

Borax contains tetranuclear coordination complexes $\ce{[B4O5(OH)4]^-^2}$. I'm asking about the name of this complex in borax.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The name suggested here (via the question comments), the anion-corresponding part, ‘bicyclo[3.3.1]tetraboroxane-3,7-diolate’ ($\ce{[B4O5(O)2]^2-}$) obviously does not match with the tetraborate formula $\ce{[B4O5(OH)4]^2-}$ present in borax, whose structure, confirmed by X-ray crystallography, including hydrogens[1], is

Fig.1 Tetraborate anion

However, the ‘bicyclo[3.3.1]tetraboroxane’ part is correct, for the parent hydride:

Fig.2 Bicyclotetraboroxane

This type of names is known e.g. for the ‘cyclotriboroxane’ name for boroxine, or ‘cyclotetrasiloxane’ (in octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane).

So the name would be rather 1,3,5,7-tetrahydroxybicyclo[3.3.1]tetraboroxane, or bicyclo[3.3.1]tetraboroxane-1,3,5,7-tetrol, however it still does not explicitly tell that it's an anion.

Interestingly, this boroxane, siloxane type names (interchanging element/oxygen pattern) is rather marginally mentioned in the inorganic nomenclature, notably more detailed in the organic nomenclature.[2]

Inorganic additive nomenclature is able to constructs names for similar skeletons,[3] but somewhat differently than organic nomenclature.

E.g. bicyclo[x.y.z]Nane (where N is the numerical prefix root, with the exception for 1..4, ‘meth’..‘but’, for the organic names) would be named: Ncarby-[0a.z1,b]dicycle, where a = x+y+2 and b = x+2. If the structure is an ion, it's ‘…cyclate’ followed by the charge in parentheses. One advantage is that the first numeral is the size of the (largest) cycle, not just a branch.

Some examples from the book:

Example 1

1,7-diazyundecasulfy-[012.11,7]dicycle
(IR-1.5.3.4 Example 6)

Example 2

cyclo-triphosporic acid
2,4,6-trihydroxido-2,4,6-trioxido-1,3,5-trioxy-2,4,6-triphosphy-[6]cycle
(IR-8.3 Example 5)

Example 3

tetraaluminy-1-lithy-[05.01,301,402,5]tetracyclate(1−)
(IR-7.4.3 Example 11)

(The leading zero in the first numeral in the square brackets is intentional for the cycles, however in the latter example, it's not used, despite IR-7.4.2 Nodal descriptor, example 3, that states that the nodal descriptor for hexacycle is ‘06’.)

With this nomenclature we can get very descriptive (but almost unusable) names
1,3,5,7-tetrahydroxido-1,3,5,7-tetrabory-2,4,6,8,9-pentaoxy-[08.11,5]dicyclate(2−),
1,3,5,7-tetrahydroxidotetrabory-2,4,6,8,9-pentaoxy-[08.11,5]dicyclate(2−), or
1,3,5,7-tetrahydroxido-1,3,5,7-tetraborypentaoxy-[08.11,5]dicyclate(2−).

References:

  1. Levy H.A., Lisensky G.C. Crystal structures of sodium sulfate decahydrate (Glauber's salt) and sodium tetraborate decahydrate (borax). Redetermination by neutron diffraction Acta Crystallographica Section B 34 (1978): p. 3507
  2. IUPAC Blue Book 2013, P-52.1.6.2
  3. IUPAC Red Book 2005, IR-7.4 Additive nomenclature: Inorganic chains and rings
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.