1
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

Since we know in sodium chloride crystal sodium ions are surrounded by $6$ chloride ions and each chloride ions are again bonded to $6$ sodium ions. What I want to know is that on what basis empirical formula of sodium chloride was assigned to be NaCl? does that formula mean sodium ion should atleast bonded to one chloride ion?

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Jon Custer, paracetamol, Todd Minehardt, Mithoron, Pritt Balagopal Jul 5 '17 at 15:22

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

5
$\begingroup$

The empirical formula of, say, $\ce{P4O10}$ is $\ce{P2O5}$ but that doesn't mean that each phosphorus is bonded to only 2.5 oxygens. It's perfectly possible (and in fact it is pretty much a requirement) that if Na has 6 nearest-neighbour Cl and Cl has 6 nearest-neighbour Na, then the overall stoichiometry is NaCl.

Let's say, for example, that there are $n$ sodium atoms in a sample of NaCl. Then, if each $\ce{Na+}$ atom has 6 nearest-neighbour $\ce{Cl-}$ ions, then at first glance we might say there are $6n$ chloride ions.

However, since each $\ce{Cl-}$ ion has 6 nearest-neighbour $\ce{Na+}$ ions, this means that in the earlier calculation we counted each $\ce{Cl-}$ ion 6 times (once per $\ce{Na+}$ neighbour). So in fact there are only $6n/6 = n$ chloride ions, leading to a stoichiometry of $1:1$.

Maybe if this is too complicated for you, you can reduce it to one dimension. Consider the following (infinite) arrangement of red and green trees along a road:

Trees: ...red-green-red-green-red-green...

Surely you'd agree that each red tree has two green neighbours, and each green tree has two red neighbours. Yet the "stoichiometry" is obviously $1:1$.

Now if you tile that in three dimensions, you get the $\ce{NaCl}$ structure.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.