Furthermore, consideration of the tunneling in the framework of the Wigner theory assumes that the tunneling factor is small. However, the $\ce{O-H}$ frequency is very high ($\gg k_\mathrm{B}T/h$), and the H atom tunneling under a potential energy barrier when proceeding either from a ground or from other excited vibration levels may be significant.

Source: German, E. D.; Sheintuch, M. Kinetics of Catalytic OH Dissociation on Metal Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (9), 5700–5709. DOI:10.1021/jp2106499.

Why does a higher frequency influence the quantum tunneling effect?


It is not the frequency per se but the mass that is important,; the probability of tunnelling an energy E is given by

$$p(E)=\exp \left(-\frac{4\pi\sqrt{m}}{h^2}\int_{x_a}^{x_b}\sqrt{V(x)-E}\;dx \right)$$

where $x_a$ and $x_b$ are two points either side of the potential barrier through which tunnelling occurs. The integral is in effect a measure of the area of the potential $V$ above position $x_a$ to $x_b$ through which tunnelling can occur.

As m increases, for a given potential barrier and energy, the tunnelling probability falls.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ But why does the author say it that way and compare it with kT/h? $\endgroup$ – wangge Jun 25 '17 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ @wangge Don't know other than $k_BT/h$ has units of $s^{-1}$ but in this case is not a frequency but units of a first order rate constant. $\endgroup$ – porphyrin Jun 25 '17 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ I believe the comparison to $k_BT/h$ is more commonly talked about as the dimensionless ratio $\hbar\omega/k_bT$. I have seen this comparison made quite a few times when discussing nuclear quantum effects, as it essentially measures whether or not we are in the classical regime where thermal effects will be most important. For something like $\ce{O-H}$, this ratio is quite large even at room temperature. Also note that this shows up in the tunneling rate given above by means of $E$ which will be quite close to the vibrational energy of the $\ce{O-H}$. Hence talk of the vibrational frequency. $\endgroup$ – jheindel Dec 12 '17 at 22:00
  • $\begingroup$ @jheindel good point. $\endgroup$ – porphyrin Dec 15 '17 at 23:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.