3
$\begingroup$

Refer to Q31)a)

Need clarification on Q31a) in the image. Possibly a dumb question but the book's answer might be wrong. The book says lithium ions will be reduced instead of potassium ions. How is this true when K+ ions are stronger oxidants?

Their answer for part d even reiterates that's Li+ will react in preference to K+ so I think I may be wrong...not sure how though

Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Who says K+ ions are stronger oxidants? It might seem so according to standard electrode potentials, but those only apply to water solutions. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Jun 1 '17 at 10:37
  • $\begingroup$ How does a molten electrolyte change this? $\endgroup$ – Destudent Jun 1 '17 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ everything is relative $\endgroup$ – Fl.pf. Jun 1 '17 at 12:18
2
$\begingroup$

$\ce{Li+}$ 's low standard reduction potential value applies to aqueous solutions only.

$\ce{Li+}$ has very high polarising power due to its small size (and in turn a high hydration energy). This is why $\ce{Li+}$ has a very low reduction potential compared to other alkali metals in aqueous solutions.

When you deal with a solution of molten metals, the idea of hydration energy makes no sense anymore. Therefore, the electrochemical series order for aqueous solutions isn't applicable to the molten solution of alkali metals.

As you go down the alkali metal group, the ionisation energy decreases. The tendency of an atom to give its electron (or get oxidised) increases. Therefore, potassium oxidises more easily than lithium or in other words, potassium has a lesser tendency to get reduced compared to lithium.

As lithium has a higher tendency to get reduced than potassium, lithium gets deposited instead of potassium.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.