enter image description here

I was wondering what the difference between $c_n$ and $c_{jn}$ is? In the context of molecular orbital construction, for example, if $c_{jn}$ is the coefficient of the basis functions $\phi_j$ (contribution of the constituting atomic orbitals), what would $c_n$ be?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $c_n$ is an eigenvector, $c_{jn}$ is a value of an eigenvector $\endgroup$ – Fl.pf. May 30 '17 at 17:08
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, the commonest of sins in mathematical chemistry, elimination of indices without changing the parent symbols... $\endgroup$ – pentavalentcarbon May 30 '17 at 18:21
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Isn't Math.SE a proper place for this question? $\endgroup$ – Ruslan May 30 '17 at 19:34
  • $\begingroup$ @pentavalentcarbon yeah wherever that's from, it's really bad.... $\endgroup$ – Fl.pf. May 31 '17 at 6:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Ruslan Under the strictest rules, this does belong on Math.SE. However, I argue that this is a prime example of fundamental quantum chemistry (with the example given) and one where notation is important. IMO, chemists tend to be sloppy here. $\endgroup$ – pentavalentcarbon May 31 '17 at 13:34

$\mathbf{c}_n$ is a vector with $N$ entries (I switched to boldface to indicate - hopefully slightly more clearly - that it is a vector):

$$\mathbf{c}_n = \begin{pmatrix}c_{1n} \\ c_{2n} \\ \vdots \\ c_{Nn}\end{pmatrix}$$

This effectively means the same thing as writing

$$\psi_n = c_{1n}\phi_1 + c_{2n}\phi_2 + \cdots + c_{Nn}\phi_N = \sum_j c_{jn}\phi_j$$

I'll try to contextualise it. The columns of the eigenvector matrix are simply the eigenvectors themselves, so if (for example) the eigenvectors of an operator $\mathbf{A}$ are

$$\mathbf{c}_1 = \begin{pmatrix}p \\ q\end{pmatrix}; \qquad \mathbf{c}_2 = \begin{pmatrix}r \\ s\end{pmatrix}$$

then the corresponding eigenvector matrix $\mathbf{C}$ is

$$\mathbf{C} = \begin{pmatrix} \mathbf{c}_1 & \mathbf{c}_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} p & r \\ q & s \end{pmatrix}$$

[As an addendum: If the eigenvectors $\mathbf{c}_i$ are normalised, then you will find that

$$\mathbf{C}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{C} = \begin{pmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 \end{pmatrix}$$

where $\lambda_i$ is the eigenvalue of $\mathbf{c}_i$, i.e. $\mathbf{Ac}_i = \lambda_i\mathbf{c}_i$.]

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.