5
$\begingroup$

Total chemistry newbie here (so this may be a fairly obvious question). With that said, I've had a niggling question that I can't quite resolve myself;

Given that galvanic corrosion is driven by the different electronegativities of different elements, why don't alloys made of significantly different elements self-galvanically corrode very quickly?

Essentially, if I were to place two electrically connected lumps in a conducting bath, one of copper and one of tin (with an anodic difference of 0.3V), I would expect them to corrode relatively quickly. Yet if I make these lumps small enough (i.e. make an alloy of them) the resulting bronze mass is fairly resilient. At what size do the individual lumps of copper and tin change from being rapidly corroding to something stable?

|improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

They certainly can. Most cases where the alloying compound is more noble this is a hazard. Nickel in Iron is a popular example, you can get corrosion acceleration on the iron by reduction happening on the Ni-surfaces.

Where the alloying element is less noble you usually have superficial corrosion to begin with but in the end the resulting surface is protected by the main element - which is common for bronze(s). If you just have lumps, then you do not have a bronze and slowly but certainly, nature will reclaim the tin.

One has to care about the homogeneity of the alloy.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, so would it be reasonable to say that if I were to magically construct a "bronze" by embedding small spheres of tin in a copper bulk, that I would get similar corrosion behavior even for macroscopic (say, micrometer-sized) tin spheres? Essentially, the tin is selectively corroded eventually leaving a pitted contiguous copper surface? And should the tin content increase, would it be reasonable to expect both an actual bronze and this pseudo-bronze to become more and more sponge-like as the tin corrodes? $\endgroup$ – Jonathan May 29 '17 at 12:56
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, insofar as the "magic" part - excepting that then certainly it is "reasonable". In real life though, when creating the bronze you will during the hot parts of that process always have some solvation. If you quench it so you get $\beta$-tin in it I'm not sure what would happen but it would have poor mechanical properties. $\endgroup$ – Stian Yttervik May 29 '17 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ Well, that's what I have my magic atom-at-a-time 3D-printer for =) It's always nice when "reasonable" mental models predict reality well. Many thanks! $\endgroup$ – Jonathan May 29 '17 at 13:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.