1
$\begingroup$

When mathematically describing an equilibrium reaction, we generally treat it as though it is enough just to specify the equilibrium constant, as it relates the concentrations of products and reactants.

If this equilibrium reaction is occurring in a highly reactive environment, however, where the reactants and the products are constantly changing due to other reactions, it seems to me that the equilibrium reaction can no longer be described by equilibrium constant only. Instead, the forward and/or reverse reaction coefficients are needed (in addition to the equilibrium constant) to describe the relationship between the reactants and the products. Is this correct? If not, why not?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Pretty much OK. $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    May 23 '17 at 18:07
  • $\begingroup$ Hello and welcome to Chemistry.SE. Feel free to visit the help center if you have any questions about how to best use this site. Best of luck! $\endgroup$
    – airhuff
    May 23 '17 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ Note that "time-dependent equilibrium reaction" is oxymoronic, as equilibrium assumes time invariance. $\endgroup$
    – a-cyclohexane-molecule
    May 23 '17 at 18:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @a-cyclohexane-molecule Good point. Title revised...better? $\endgroup$
    – hBy2Py
    May 23 '17 at 18:55
3
$\begingroup$

You're correct. If other reactions are occurring that are fast on the time scale of the equilibrium reactions, then you must treat the forward and reverse reactions separately, including by using their separate rate constants.

"Equilibrium" is a mathematical model that never actually perfectly matches reality. In order for most systems to actually be at "perfect equilibrium" we would have to let them sit and react for an infinite amount of time. Of course, practically speaking, that's not necessary: equilibrium is reached to within measurement precision in quite reasonable amounts of time for many reactions. What's necessary in order for the concept of 'equilibrium' to be useful in analyzing a reaction system is for the time scale of those reactions to be "very short" (or, equivalently, for the rate of those reactions to be "very fast") when compared to all other reactions of interest in the system.

In other words, when we write the following system of reactions:

$$ \ce{A + B <=>[K_1] C + D} \\ ~ \\ \ce{C + E ->[k_2] P} $$

what we're really writing is:

$$ \ce{A + B \underset{k_{-1}}{\overset{k_1}{\rightleftarrows}} C + D} \\ ~ \\ \ce{C + E ->[k_2] P} \\ ~ \\ \begin{align} k_1\ce{[A][B]} &\gg k_2\ce{[C][E]} \\ k_{-1}\ce{[C][D]} &\gg k_2\ce{[C][E]} \\ K_1 &= {k_1 \over k_{-1}} \end{align} $$

The relative values of the forward and reverse rate constants can vary, with their ratio described by $K_1$, but at all points through the reacting process of interest, both the forward and reverse equilibrium reactions are assumed to be much faster than the final, product-forming reaction. If this assumption doesn't hold, then we can't treat the first reaction as "just" an equilibrium reaction.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.