I am not able to understand the difference between structure of $\ce{SCl_{2}(OCH_{3})_{2}}$ and $\ce{SF_{2}(OCH_{3})_{2}}$.

I am already well versed with Molecular Orbital and VSEPR theories. I found the geometries, but don't understand why they are:

enter image description here

Why is the $\ce{F}$ at axial positions and $\ce{Cl}$ on the other hand in equatorial positions? (I am not able to understand Bent's Rule to be straight-forward, I have read Wikipedia already.)

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Related: Why does F replace the axial bond in PCl5? $\endgroup$ – orthocresol May 11 '17 at 18:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As a general reminder: The involvement of d-orbitals into the bonding is one of the many shortcomings of VSEPR theory. The sp³d hybridisation simply is not evident (and it is not necessary) in the bonding of these molecules. I can't stress that enough. Textbooks which still rely on this explanation are outdated and desperately need revision. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン May 12 '17 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I think I understand it now..... Things became more clearer by Ron's answer to the question suggested above by Orthocresol (Thanks!) and I got to know that my textbook is outdated, cheers to Martin. $\endgroup$ – Gaurav Agarwal May 13 '17 at 11:17
  • $\begingroup$ @orthocresol I'm not sure that Bent's rule is straight forward to use here, and I am especially not sure, whether the given geometries are indeed correct. From my initial calculations, the lowest energy structure also has a co-linear arrangement of Cl-S-Cl. $\endgroup$ – Martin - マーチン May 19 '17 at 12:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.