I stumbled across a peculiar detail while reading the chapter about the Chemical Revolution in Bowler and Morus' book Making Modern Science. According to this book, Dalton argued that compound elements are created in the simplest possible way. For instance a compound consisting of equal number of X- and Y-atoms would then consist of one X-atom and one Y-atom. Still, in this illustration from Dalton's New System of Chemical Philosophy, oxygen with phosphor (compound 51) consists of two oxygen and two phosphor atoms. What is the reason for this?

John Dalton, A New Chemical Philosophy Volume 1, Part 2, 1810. Source: http://library.brown.edu/exhibit/exhibits/show/evolution-of-chemistry/the-language-of-chemistry/the-geometric-notation-system


The plate is from Dalton's book A New System of Chemical Philosophy.

The explanation of the plate is on pages 546-547 of the book.

The explanation says that "51" is "phosphorous acid" with weight 32.

(keep in mind that Dalton is basing this on O=7 and P=9)

"52" is "phosphoric acid" with weight 23.

The discussion of phosphorous acid is mostly on pages 408-410.

Initially, he contradicts the plate saying "I am inclined to believe" that phosphorous acid is one O and one P with a weight of 7 + 9 = 16.

But then he says:

If this be the case, it may appear singular that none of the other elements exhibit acid properties when combined with 1 atom of oxygen ; but it should be observed, that the phosphoric oxide is in a liquid form, and disposed to separate into phosphorus and phosphoric acid, circumstances that do not combine in regard to the other oxides. In fact, phosphorous acid may be considered as phosphoric acid holding phosphorous in solution, rather than a distinct acid.

So, if phosphoric acid (one phosphorous atom and two oxygen atoms accord to Dalton) "holds" another phosphorous atom, the result is what is show on the plate.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.