# Why is 2s more stable than 2p, if 2p experiences greater effective nuclear charge?

I'm referring specifically to this graph, which appeared in a chemistry lecture but which the lecturer could not explain. We know that 2s is lower energy than 2p. But surely those electrons in 2p orbitals, which apparently experience greater effective nuclear charge for Z > 10, would have lower energy! Can someone reconcile my understanding of orbital energy levels and this diagram?

• perhaps you could explain how $Z_{eff}$ was calculated? – porphyrin Mar 28 '17 at 10:24

We generally consider the $2s$ orbital to be lower in energy than the $2p$ because the $2s$ has some density inside the radial node that we think of as "nuclear penetration," i.e., the $2s$ electrons are able to get closer to the nucleus through the $1s$ core electrons. Now, once you add a $3s$ electron, I wonder if the innermost radial probability regions of the $3s$ actually repel the $2s$ electrons more than the $2p$ electrons which are generally farther away. The differential repulsion would have to happen in such a way so that it more than compensates for any nuclear penetration effects of the $2s$ electrons. This would certainly align with the observation that the $2p$ electrons are more stabilized only when we add a $3s$ electron.