5
$\begingroup$

For oxidant/reductants and conjugate pairs, for example $\ce{MnO2 -> Mn^2+}$, do we write $\ce{Mn^4+}$ or $\ce{MnO2}$ as the oxidant? Websites conflicts what my text book says, because it appears that my text book would write the conjugate pair as $\ce{Mn^4+/Mn^2+}$ which implies that it considers $\ce{Mn^4+}$ is the oxidant not $\ce{MnO2}$.

I just realised my example wouldn't work for what I was trying to say since $\ce{MnO2}$ does not exist in ionic form. But using a compound that did exist in the ionic form, would I be saying that the oxidant is the entire compound or the ion that has a change in oxidation number?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You generally use whichever compound is actually present in solution.

For manganese(IV), it will practically always be $\ce{MnO2}$ so use that. Manganese(VII) will always be $\ce{MnO4-}$ so use that. Manganese(II) salts dissolved in water dissociate and coordination complexes of manganese(II) are very labile. Thus, it doesn’t make sense to assume any $\ce{[MnL_n]^2+}$ complex to predominate and you should simply use $\ce{Mn^2+}$.

It does, for example, make a difference if your iron redox pair is $\ce{Fe^2+/Fe^3+}$ or $\ce{[Fe(CN)6]^3-/[Fe(CN)6]^4-}$. Likewise, a reduction using tin(II) should better be written $\ce{Sn^2+/[SnCl6]^2-}$.

If you are in doubt whether something dissociates or whether it should be considered a single entity, the cleaner solution is probably to write the fully dissociated salt, so you can get away with using $\ce{Sn^2+/Sn^4+}$. However, as soon as molecules or oxyanions are involved you cannot resort to this; oxalate reductions have to be $\ce{C2O4^2-/CO2}$ and permanganate has to be $\ce{MnO4-/product}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.