0
$\begingroup$

I was interested in knowing if Low Energy Nuclear Reactions are practical or just mythical. What is the current stance of the scientific society about their feasibility?

$\endgroup$

closed as too broad by Todd Minehardt, Klaus-Dieter Warzecha, jerepierre, airhuff, Zhe Mar 14 '17 at 16:58

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ If they are trying to sell you free energy, it is nonsense. There are some interesting, but known, nuclear reactions but they are not particularly practical for energy production. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Mar 14 '17 at 12:55
3
$\begingroup$

The stance is currently an even mix of hogwash conspiracy theories, pseudoscience and scams.

Even if the field had merit - which it most likely doesn't, the number of anti-scientific "papers" on the subject has ruined it for a long time.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.