4
$\begingroup$

Software: G09.Rev.D.01

=======gjf-file======

%chk=F:\Hanion.chk
# hf/sto-3g geom=connectivity

Title Card Required

-1 2
 He                 0.20408162    0.07288005   -0.00095405

 1

Causes error message #2070 Log file explanation:

 There are   2 occupied orbitals but only   1 basis functions!

But the same time for the Lithium which is the same electron structure, method STO-3G work fine.

Why Gaussian soft (STO-3G) causes error for Helium anion?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

An orbital of a closed-shell Hartree-Fock calculation can only contain two elctrons, one with alpha ("up") and one with beta ("down") spin.

You are calculating the Helium-anion. In a minimal STO-3G basis, it comes with one(!) basis function (or, loosly speaking, "orbital"), as it has two electrons in its neutral form. The anion however has three electrons. So, one closed-shell orbital is certainly not enough to host three electrons. The calculation works for Lithium a.) because gaussian automatically assumes that you want to perform an unrestricted-calculation as the number of electrons is uneven (this is also the case for the helium-anion, but I am not sure if you are aware of this). Furthermore, Lithium has three electrons "by nature" (in its neutral state) and therefore, two basis-functions are enough to host four electrons.

You are using the STO-3G minimal basis, which adds one basis-function per two electrons of the system in the closed-shell case and one per electron in the open-shell case. Of importance is not the actual number of electrons in your system but the number of electrons the neutral atoms composing your system have. For a quick fix, substitute "hf/sto-3g" with "uhf/cc-pVDZ" and your calculation will run without issues.

Your system has an uneven number of electrons, so you cannot run a restricted (closed-shell) HF calculation. Either perform an unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) or a restricted open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF) calculation. Both are available in gaussian09. As said, gaussian is already automatically doing this as a restricted HF calculation of a system with an uneven number of electrons is not possible.

Furthermore, as the calculation of the Helium-anion is quite fast, you should considering using a larger basis. You can start with "cc-pVDZ", a Dunning correlation-consistent basis-set, and move on from there.

For a comprehensive introduction to electronic-structure theory I suggest you read the book by Szabo and Ostlund. It assumes no previous mathematical or chemical knowledge above high-school-calculus und explains all the conceptual issues I have just mentioned in a detailed and understandible manner. Also, this book is quite affordable. http://store.doverpublications.com/0486691861.html

If this is too much, I suggest you at least look up the Roothan-Hall and the Pople-Nesbet equations for running an electronic structure calculation in a basis, as Gaussian builds on them.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For H-atom method STO-3G require three gausians (1s = c1*Gaussian1 + c2*Gaussian2+c3*Gaussian3). For the Helium-atom also three, but for He-anion six or more. Am I right? $\endgroup$ – Sergio Mar 11 '17 at 17:14
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I think I understand. STO-3G take 3G per one orbital due to period (in periodic table). For 1st period - 1 STO = 3G, for 2nd - 5STO = 15G and so on. And if I perform STO-3G on He anion, G09 does not know about apeared orbitals, and as a result, crushes. $\endgroup$ – Sergio Mar 11 '17 at 19:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That is sort of right, yes. You have correctly summarized why gaussian crashed in your case. Keep in mind that in a STO-3G basis the coefficients of the three gaussian functions are NOT optimized. They are contracted to one function and the coefficient thereof is optimized. From the view of the Roothan-Hall-Equations, a STO-3G basis has one coefficient. The coefficients of the three gaussians are kept constant. Again, for mroe info, see Szabo & Ostlund $\endgroup$ – mrnicegyu11 Mar 11 '17 at 20:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.