5
$\begingroup$

The question is to find out the $\mathrm{pH}$ of a mixture of weak acid and strong acid. My book just states the formula as $$\mathrm{pH}=-\log \frac{C_2+\sqrt{C_2^2+4K_\mathrm{a}C_1}}{2}$$

where $C_1$ is the concentration (in mole/litre) of the weak acid (ionisation constant $K_\mathrm{a}$), and $C_2$ is that of the strong acid.

I understand that the strong acid will dissociate completely and the weak acid will dissociate with an ionisation constant. So the $\ce{H+}$ ion concentration from strong acid will be simply $C_2$ and that from weak acid will be $\sqrt{K_\mathrm{a}C_1}$. But I could not derive the above formula for the $\mathrm{pH}$ using these facts. I need help here.

$\endgroup$
8
$\begingroup$

Chemical thermodynamics is easy in that it always has enough equations to derive all the variables involved, and guarantees to produce a unique solution. The derivation itself may be not that easy, but that's another story.

In short, we have some weak acid $\ce{HA}$ and the products of its dissociation. Mind you, $\ce{H+}$ comes also from the strong acid, which dissociates completely. Now, the equations:

$$ \ce{[HA] + [A-] = }C_1 \\ \ce{[H+]=[A-]}+C_2 \\ {\ce{[H+][A-]}\over\ce{[HA]}} = K_\mathrm{a} $$

Is the rest clear?

Use the second equation to exclude $\ce{[A-]}$, then use the first to exclude $\ce{[HA]}$, and end up with a quadratic equation on $\ce{H+}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer.can you please explain how you wrote down first two equations. $\endgroup$ – Pink Feb 26 '17 at 11:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, the first one is just the conservation law: the summary concentration of protonated and deprotonated forms of HA is always the same, for it can't be created or destroyed. The second is charge conservation: for every H+, there is an A- or the other anion. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Feb 26 '17 at 13:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nope. I used A for the anion of the weak acid. The strong acid I didn't identify at all, because why would I? $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Feb 26 '17 at 16:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ First formula is OK. Second formula is OK if Ka is negligibly low compared to C2, but in that case it can be simplified further. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Aug 18 '18 at 12:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ignore the dissociation of the weak acid altogether. $\endgroup$ – Ivan Neretin Aug 23 '18 at 17:09
-1
$\begingroup$

enter image description here

-The above workup should be pretty easy to understand.

-The only tough task is to understand the approximation in 3rd last step.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ivan's answer was sufficient. $\endgroup$ – Archer Apr 19 '18 at 8:37
  • $\begingroup$ He just gave hints.The above answer is complete workup. $\endgroup$ – Ritwik Das Apr 19 '18 at 8:37
  • $\begingroup$ The answer was accepted which means the OP was able to do the working himself. It's just about solving a quadratic. $\endgroup$ – Archer Apr 19 '18 at 8:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Hey Ritwik, thanks for your answer! Unfortunately though, most of what you wrote is already covered by Ivan's answer. Only a quadratic equation needed to be solved, as Abcd also said. The only new thing I see is a simple statement: "$K_1<C_2$ (magnitude wise)". Perhaps, that was better suited as a comment on Ivan's answer instead? || Also, we support mathjax on our site. You needn't paste photos of math expressions, head over here to learn more. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Gaurang Tandon Apr 19 '18 at 9:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.