It the notation $\mathrm{p_x}$, $\mathrm{p_y}$ and $\mathrm{d_{x^2{-}y^2}}$, are the subscripts variables (and therefore should be in italics) or are they labels (labels for directions, I suppose, and therefore should be upright)?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The notation is for the subshells of electrons in atoms. The uses of x,y, and z correspond to the x,y and z axis in 3D space, and are therefore labels not variables. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital#Orbitals_table for the visualized shapes. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Feb 21 '17 at 6:36
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Max you sure they should be upright? I thought they're used slanted-ly everywhere. $\endgroup$ – M.A.R. Feb 21 '17 at 8:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'll defer to the ACS style guide -- italic. $\endgroup$ – MaxW Feb 21 '17 at 14:59

The subscripts that specify orbital axes are written in italic. This is mentioned in ACS style guide.$^{[1]}$ So for instance

$$\mathrm{d}_{x^2 - y^2}.$$

Be careful though. Other subscripts for orbitals are generally upright, e.g.,


$[1]$ Anne M. Coghill, Lorrin R. Garson. ($2006$). The ACS Style Guide. Effective Communication of Scientific Information. American Chemical Society. DOI: 10.1021/bk-2006-STYG, ISBN: 9780841239999 (print), 9780841228306 (online). (p 256)

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ I would say this contradicts the basic rule of labels being upright (and I consider an axis name a label), but there we go. $\endgroup$ – mhchem Feb 21 '17 at 9:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mhchem No, I don't think that is correct. It does not refer to the axis. It refers to a mathematical function which appears in the wavefunction corresponding to the orbital. There is no "x2-y2" axis. It just means that that d orbital has a x2-y2 term in its wavefunction. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Feb 21 '17 at 10:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The p orbitals just happen to be "(a whole bunch of other stuff) multiplied by one of (x, y, z)". The p_z orbital does indeed point along the z-axis but it is not named so because it points along that axis. $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Feb 21 '17 at 10:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, I believe @orthocresol is correct. The terms are still called orbital axes though AFAIK, but the analogy indeed only works for $(x, y, z)$. (Correct me if I am wrong.) $\endgroup$ – Linear Christmas Feb 21 '17 at 11:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See also: Why do the d orbitals have these notations? $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Feb 21 '17 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.