2
$\begingroup$

Mass spectrum of the unknown compound "MS88"

I'm given the above spectrum. $M^+ = 102$, probably $\ce{C_6H_14O}$ or $\ce{C_5H_10O_2}$.

I'm thinking of ethyl propionate. (that picture also shows the fragments I expect). I can account for the following peaks: m/z = 73: Loss of ethyl from acyl side (expected lowish intensity) m/z = 57: Loss of alkoxy to form CH3CH2CO+ (moderate intensity) m/z = 45: Alkoxy ion (weak) m/z = 29: ethyl carbocation, moderate intensity.

I can't account for 74, since according to my book the alkoxy side would not proceed through normal Mclafferty, but the Mclafferty + 1 rearrangement... That should yield m/z=75.

I proposed methyl butyrate, and of course that's not right. My instructor wrote to pay attention to the m/z = 57 (M-45) and m/z = 85 (M-17). This fits well with carboxylic acids, but again cannot account for the m/z = 74. McLafferty of carboxylic acids would result in a fragment of m/z=60...

Can someone help me out, I've come to a dead end for hours now.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

I was on to the wrong structure. My main issue with the carboxylic acid was the fragment m/z=60 that it would produce by McLafferty. I didn't have that, so I thought that left me with t-Bu-COOH, which was the only structure with no $\gamma$-hydrogens. Besides I couldn't explain the m/z=74 peak with an acid. On the other hand I couldn't explain the M-17 peak by ethylpropanoate.

But of course, if the carboxylic acid has a methyl substituent at the $\alpha$-carbon, then that methyl group would also be part of the McLafferty fragment, therefore resulting in m/z=74!

The spectre is of: 2-methyl-butanoic acid

M-17 and M-45:

Alpha cleavage of carbonyl => loss of hydroxyl radical or carboxyl radical


m/z = 74:

Loss of ethene by McLafferty rearrangement


m/z = 45:

$\ce{COOH^+}$ fragment


M-15 and M-29:

Loss of methyl radical or ethyl radical


m/z = 29:

Ethyl carbocation

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

For m/z 74 it could be methyl ester:

CH2=C(OH)OCH3+

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This doesn't seem likely to me, especially considering the intensity. Do you suggest a mechanism :-)? $\endgroup$ – Brian Nov 9 '13 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ May be I'm wrong, but I've thought in the lost of a CH2=CH2 by a McLafferty rearrangement. $\endgroup$ – RFG Nov 9 '13 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ Okay I just read it again. It is the ethyl ester that fits with many of the peaks, but I was troubled because I thought the book said it would only undergo McLafferty+1 rearrangement (with double proton transfer, M/Z=75), but apparently that's just an additional mode of fragmentation to the normal McLafferty arrangement. This gives [CH3CH2C(OH)O]+ m/z=74. I would like to explain the m/z=85 though, now that my instructor pointed my attention to it. hmm $\endgroup$ – Brian Nov 10 '13 at 7:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Possibilty: Loss of a hydroxyl group (m = 17). $\endgroup$ – RFG Nov 10 '13 at 10:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.