2
$\begingroup$

Changes in internal energy at

  1. At constant temperature, $$d U = \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_TdV$$

  2. At constant volume, $$d U = \left({\partial U \over \partial T}\right)_VdT$$

  3. When both temperature and volume is changing, $$d U = \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_TdV +\left({\partial U \over \partial T}\right)_VdT$$

I want to know how do we get these equations.


I think I can speculate a bit about how do we get the first and second equation.

For the first equation, since the temperature is kept constant, we can plot a U-V graph.

Tell me if I am wrong here but for that graph the slope at a given point is $\displaystyle \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_T$.

Now since the change is a infinitesimal change, the slope of tangent at that point is given by $\displaystyle \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_T$.

So $\displaystyle {\Delta U \over \Delta V} = \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_T$, since the change is infinitesimal, $\Delta U = dU, \Delta V = dV$ and substituting this we will get out equation 1. Same can be said for equation 2.

I have no idea how do we get the equation 3, I think it is a clever use of product rule or something like that.


  • Is my understanding for the equations 1 and 2 correct ?
  • How do we get equation 3 from 1 and 2 ? because simply adding 1 and 2 does only give the RHS of 3 not the LHS.
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

One definition of a state function such as internal energy $U$ is that its infinitesimal change is equal to an exact differential. Thus in general

$$\mathrm{d}U=\sum_{i=1}^n\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial x_i}\right)_{x_j} \mathrm{d}x_i.$$

There are various variables with regard to which one can apply the partial derivative. Entropy, volume, temperature to name a few. Usually we assume that our thermodynamic state functions are two-dimensional but this is only if the number of moles is constant.

$$\mathrm{d}U= \frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\mathrm{d}T + \frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\mathrm{d}V +\sum_{i=1}^k\frac{\partial U}{\partial n_i}\mathrm{d}n_i \overset{\mathrm{d}n_j\ =\ 0}{\implies} \mathrm{d}U = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{V,n_j}\mathrm{d}T + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_{T,n_j}\mathrm{d}V.$$

A good way to think of this assumption is that other functions are also simply functions of $T$ and $V$, e.g., $S = S(T,V)$. From the equation

$$\mathrm{d}U = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_{V,n_j}\mathrm{d}T + \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right)_{T,n_j}\mathrm{d}V$$

you can reach the other two equations by imposing $\mathrm{d}T = 0$ and $\mathrm{d}V = 0$, respectively.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So my way of thinking of how first and second equation is incorrect ? $\endgroup$ – A---B Feb 11 '17 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ Also can please you explain a bit more about how did you get the second equation. I did not understand that. $\endgroup$ – A---B Feb 11 '17 at 19:12
  • $\begingroup$ @A---B You are right that if temperature is constant, then you are essentially in a sliver where $U$ varies as $V$ is changed. And yes, the derivative $\left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_T$ will thus be the "slope" in that particular direction. Using $${\Delta U \over \Delta V} = \left({\partial U \over \partial V}\right)_T$$ is not a rigorous way of thinking about it though. I would focus on the general case (the total or exact differential) and derive equations $1$ and $2$ from there. $\endgroup$ – Linear Christmas Feb 11 '17 at 19:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @A---B Oh, just a random variable. Later on I took $x_1 = T, x_2 = V, x_3 = n_1$ and so on. $\endgroup$ – Linear Christmas Feb 11 '17 at 19:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @A---B Glad I could help! $\endgroup$ – Linear Christmas Feb 11 '17 at 19:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.