This question already has an answer here:
- Alphabetical order in nomenclature 1 answer
This passage is contradictory. I've boxed the section that confused me.
Why would the book tell me to alphabetize substituents, only to clearly ignore its own rule about alphabetizing substituents?
Seems to me that "isopropyl" should come before "methyl," as the letter "i" is most definitely before the letter "m" in the alphabet. And the book makes no mention about ignoring the "iso-" prefix.
1) Should methyl come before isopropyl?
2) If so, why?