This reaction always occurs in the following, regiospecific way:

$$\ce{CCl4 + R-CH=CH2 ->[$h\nu$] R-CHCl-CH2-CCl3}$$

The same should apparently also happen when there is a carbon that has two substituents (e.g. methyl groups) and yield only one major product:

$$\ce{CCl4 + (CH3)2C=CH2 ->[$h\nu$] (CH3)2CCl-CH2-CCl3}$$

I believe the initiation step goes like this:

$$\ce{CCl4 ->[$h\nu$] CCl3^. + Cl^.}$$

Can't both of these radicals, that form in the initiation step, react with the double bond and form a secondary or tertiary radical carbon? Why does only $\ce{CCl3^.}$ apparently attack the double bond?

  • $\begingroup$ Is there any other information missing from this problem or in the wording of it? I would have expected both of the radicals to react significantly, although I would expect the CCl3 radical to be a less stable intermediate than the Cl radical. $\endgroup$
    – airhuff
    Jan 25, 2017 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ Is it not just a steric effect making the $\ce{CCl3\cdot}$ react more slowly and so the $\ce{Cl\cdot}$ wins out at the more crowded site? $\endgroup$
    – porphyrin
    Jan 26, 2017 at 14:53

1 Answer 1


While this reaction is highly regioselective, it is not 100% regioselective. Consider the nearly identical reactions:

$$\begin{align} \ce{CCl4 + H2C=CH-(CH2)5CH3 ->[(PhCO2)2][90\text{-}105ºC] Cl3C-CH2-CHCl-(CH2)5CH3} \hspace{.63cm} \text{75%}^{[1]}\\ \ce{CCl4 + H2C=CH-COH-(CH3)2 ->[(PhCO2)2][80ºC] Cl3C-CH2-CHCl-CH(OH)-(CH2)5CH3} \hspace{.63cm} \text{70%}^{[2]}\\ \end{align} $$

Granted these reactions use radical initiators instead of light, but that wouldn't make the difference between 100% and 70-75% regioselectivity. The reality is that at the start of the reaction, $\ce{.CCl3}$ and $\ce{.Cl}$ are both competing to attack the alkene, and $\ce{.Cl}$ does in fact attack faster. Looking at the activation energies for the abstraction of hydrogen atoms by different radicals, we gain insight into their relative stability:

$$ \small \begin{array}{lcc} \hline \text{Radical} & \ce{CH3-H} & \ce{CH3CH2-H} & \ce{(CH3)2CH-H} & \ce{(CH3)C-H}^{[3]} \\ \hline \ce{.F} & \text{1-1.5} & \text{<1} & & \text{<1} \\ \ce{.Cl} & \text{3.4} & \text{1.1} \\ \ce{.Br} & \text{17.5} & \text{13.0} & \text{9.5} & \text{6.9} \\ \ce{.CH3} & \text{14.0} & \text{11.6} & \text{9.6} & \text{8.1} \\ \ce{.CF3} & \text{10.9} & \text{8.0} & \text{6.5} & \text{4.9} \\ \ce{.CCl3} & \text{17.9} & \text{14.2} & \text{10.6} & \text{7.7*} \\ \hline _{^* \text{units are } \mathrm{kcal\ mol^{-1}}} \end{array} $$

As this reaction continues, however, chlorine atoms are abstracted from $\ce{CCl4}$, creating the product along with $\ce{.CCl3}$ radicals. Abstraction of $\ce{.CCl3}$ is highly disfavored due to steric effects. Thus, the radical chain reaction is as follows:

$$\ce{CCl4 ->[$h\nu$] .CCl3 + Cl.}$$

$$\ce{.CCl3 + CH2=CH-R -> Cl3C-CH2-\stackrel{\displaystyle .}{\ce{C}}H-R}$$

$$\ce{Cl3C-CH2-\stackrel{\displaystyle .}{\ce{C}}H-R + CCl4 -> Cl3C-CH2-CHCl-R + .CCl3}$$

The less than ideal yields of the radical addition of $\ce{CCl4}$ can be attributed to the strength of the $\ce{C-Cl}$ bond (higher activation energies correspond to slower rates of reactions). Because $\ce{CCl4}$ is in competition with the polymerization of the $\ce{.CCl3}$-alkene adduct, $\ce{BrCCl3}$ and $\ce{CBr4}$ are generally preferred for their higher selectivity, owed to the lower strength of the $\ce{C-Br}$ bond. One such example is shown below.

$$\ce{BrCCl3 + H2C=C(C2H5)2 ->[$h \nu$] Cl3C-CH2-CBr(C2H5)2} \hspace{1cm} {\text{91%}^{[4]}}$$

$^{[1]}$M. S. Kharasch, E. W. Jensen, and W. H. Urry, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 69, 1100 (1947).
$^{[2]}$P. D. Klemmensen, H. Kolind-Andersen, H. B. Madsen, and A. Svendsen, J. Org. Chem., 44, 416 (1979).
$^{[3]}$F. A. Carey, R. J. Sundberg, Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A: Structure and Mechanisms, Springer Science, New York, 2007, pg. 1034.
$^{[4]}$M. S. Kharasch and M. Sage, J. Org. Chem., 14, 537 (1949).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.