Many car manufacturers have developed projects for hydrogen cars but I've always been wondering why they put so much effort into hydrogen, as it is hard to store, and fuel-cells use to restitute energy back are based on rare-earth-metal not suitable to produce many cars for everyone.

Nature mainly store energy with carbon, I'm not a chemist but is it that hard or not yet enough economically viable for not seing rising projects around simple hydrocarbure synthesis. Easy to store, easy to consume, but maybe hard to produce, right ?

Production : $\ce{CO_2 + 2H_2O}$ (+ Renewable Energy Source) $\ce{-> CH_4 + 2O_2}$

Consumption : $\ce{CH_4 + 2O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O}$ (+ Energy To Use)

Could even $\ce{CO_2}$ be simply captured from air with limewater in such cycle ?

Sorry if my question may seems too simplistic, but I'd really like to handle (in simple terms) what are the economic/technical constraints to elaborate such apparently simple round-trip.

  • $\begingroup$ The economic barrier to this approach is the current situation of cheaply available methane via mining (natural gas wells) compared to the cost of synthesizing methane from carbon dioxide and water. $\endgroup$ – airhuff Jan 10 '17 at 19:52
  • $\begingroup$ Hum ... I quite envisage that economic barrier is still higher than technical one :/ $\endgroup$ – CitizenInsane Jan 11 '17 at 7:36
  • $\begingroup$ Carbon sequestration may be easier growing corn, feeding chickens and using their excrement to produce biogas. No need for any new technology. $\endgroup$ – Rodrigo de Azevedo Apr 13 '19 at 19:14

Vehicles that run on natural gas already exist, and have done for many years - you can find CNG (compressed natural gas) cars and larger vehicles around the world.

But there's very little synthesising of methane because there are very few places with a sensible carbon price, so it's just cheaper to extract natural gas and burn it.

Research is ongoing on methane synthesis - this is usually done under the name "power to gas", which can refer to hydrogen or methane. Either way, it usually starts with the splitting of water to get hydrogen, and then is sometimes combined with methanation of the hydrogen. The latter is an exothermic reaction, so combining the two processes can give pretty good efficiencies (see e.g. this paper).

Hydrogen / methane for cars is looking like a lost battle: electric cars have almost certainly already won; it's just going to take a few years until they completely dominate. However, there is still the possibility that larger vehicles (heavy goods vehicles, boats, aircraft) might settle on hydrogen or renewable methane as their decarbonisation option.

By the way, just because a fuel-cell might use rare-earth metals, doesn't make it unsuitable for mass market. Most rare-earth metals aren't rare, despite the name. Fuel cells have lots of issues, and fuel-cell vehicles really haven't achieved much yet, but that's to do with lack of reliability and longevity, rather than scarcity of components.

| improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Could then electric cars if they won be powered by methane-cells if it exits (so as to acheive longer distances autonomy / easier storage than pure hydrogen and less polluting than current batteries) ? $\endgroup$ – CitizenInsane Jan 14 '17 at 22:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's probably best asked on Engineering; but AFAIK methane fuel-cells have low electrical efficiency, so they get pretty hot, and aren't really yet up to the job. $\endgroup$ – 410 gone Jan 15 '17 at 10:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.