0
$\begingroup$

I am interested in Non-Stoichiometry and how it relates to crystal structures; In particular I wish to learn about surfaces of metal oxides. I am aware that point defects in such crystals are a result of an entropy driven reactions. So my question is this:

Are there any good introductory resources on this subject? I have basic undergrad chemistry and physics background.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I would strongly recommend this resource: http://www.tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/def_en/ It is a good complete on line introduction to defects theory in crystals. Some key points listed below.

The concentration of point defects $c_{PD}$ at equilibrium can be expressed by an Arrhenius formula: $$c_{PD}=A \cdot e^{-\frac{G_F}{kT}}=A \cdot e^{-\frac{S_F}{kT}}\cdot e^{-\frac{H_F}{kT}}$$ where $G_F$ is the free energy of formation, $H_F$ the enthalpy of formation and $S_F$ the entropy of formation. In solids $H_F$ can be confused with the energy of formation, $S_F$ is associated the variation of the vibration entropy of the crystal due to the introduction of a point defect. Formation enthalpies, and thus formation energies can be obtained by: $$ H_F(D) = E_{tot}(D) - E_{tot}(X)+\sum_i n_i \mu_i +q (E_F -E_V) $$

  • $E_{tot}(D)$ and $E_{tot}(X)$: total energies of the system with and without the defect D.
  • $n_i$: number of atom removed from the system, a negative value denote the addition of one atom.
  • $\mu_i$: chemical potential of the atom $i$. This should consider the chemical environment at the equilibrium condition (which reservoir is to take into account).
  • $E_F -E_V$: Fermi energy relative to the valence band maximum.
  • $q (E_F -E_V)$: energy change due to the exchange of electrons and holes with the carrier reservoirs.

For the equilibrium concentration in the multiple defects case an additional entropy term comes from the standard configuration entropy which can be calculated from the Boltzmann formula $$S=k_B \cdot \ln P$$ where P is the number of configurations for the same macrostate.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you summarize some of the pertinent points in your answer in case the link goes dead? $\endgroup$ – jonsca Nov 2 '13 at 4:28
  • $\begingroup$ The answer now is more complete $\endgroup$ – astolfo Nov 2 '13 at 8:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.