I see the question has having the following parts:
1) Does the allyl radical have a delocalized electron?
2) Is this what makes it $sp^2$ instead of $sp^3$?
3) How does an unpaired electron factor into hybridization/how do you determine the hybridization state?
4) How can you tell if an electron is delocalized in a radical?
5) Why isn't the single electron delocalized in the propyl radical
6) Since the propyl radical does not have a delocalized electron, will the radical carbon be $sp^3$ hybridized
Answer
1) Yes 
2) No, the delocalization of the electron is not the determining factor in the hybridization of the carbon atoms in the allyl radical.
3) The unpaired electron is not equivalent to an electron pair for purposes of determining hybridization state. I believe that the hybridization state is driven by the steric stability of atoms, electron pairs and lone electrons around the hybridized atom, however the effects diminish as you move from attached atoms of different elements-->lone pairs-->unpaired electrons-->delocalized electrons. In the case of the allyl or propyl radical, the effects of a lone electron are not enough to favor $sp^3$ hybridization whether it is localized or delocalized. Therefore, in these molecules, you determine the hybridization state by the number of sigma bonds, but in molecules with lone pairs, the lone pairs may or may not alter the hybridization state depending on the stability gained and lost. Orbitals in Chlorine atoms in $\ce{Cl2}$ do not hybridize, but I believe that Chlorine is considered to be $sp^3$ hybridized in some compounds if the steric interactions of the electron pairs with the attached atom are great enough. Counting electron pairs and sigma bonds therefore is not a rule, but a guideline and ultimately it comes down to stability.
4) I think I would give a simple rule that as long as you can draw a Lewis diagram where a central carbon is attached to one atom with a lone electron and another atom by a double bond, the single electron will be delocalized. What you are doing is moving electrons ONLY by making and breaking Pi bonds.
5) Because the central carbon does not have a double bond that it can break to avail itself of an unpaired electron that can pair with the unpaired electron on the radical carbon.
6) No, in this case at least, neither a delocalized electron or unpaired electron will result in the $sp^3$ hybridization being more stable and energetically favorable. Now someone said that the propyl anion is still $sp^2$ but that is not what I am used to seeing. Usually carbanions are shown as being $sp^3$. The debate, I suspect will be whether it is $sp^3$ because the electron pair has enough effect to make the stability gained by a tetrahedral geometry pay off (my view) or if it is merely the function of non-geometry related "electronic factors".