0
$\begingroup$

I want to write a sentence along the lines of:

There are four ____ in biochemistry: proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids.

Does a specific technical term exist that I can use to fill the void? Or am I relatively free in my choice?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Refer to them like what? Group or type of chemical compounds? Why not? You're asking about basic semantics... $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Nov 27 '16 at 19:37
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, I want to write a sum about the topic but I don't know the terminology. Refer to them like groups. I mean to ask if I can divide the main biochemical molecules to 4 families. $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Student Nov 27 '16 at 20:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, they are already divided - these are 4 groups of compounds. Group or type is better word then family here IMO, but what's here to ask about... $\endgroup$ – Mithoron Nov 27 '16 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ Are they the only groups of compound in biochemistry? $\endgroup$ – Ubiquitous Student Nov 27 '16 at 20:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "Classes of biomolecules". $\endgroup$ – orthocresol Dec 13 '16 at 4:42
1
$\begingroup$

I don’t know what your background is. Maybe it is organic chemistry, where the term functional group is used in a very specific way and using what would seem to be a synonym instead is wrong. Maybe it is biology (taxonomy) where it makes a big difference if a ‘group’ is an order, a family, a genus or something else.

The typical primary metabolites in biochemistry — carbohydrates, peptides/proteins, nucleic acids and lipids — do not have an overarching, widely accepted technical umbrella term. You can call them groups, classes, kinds or even types and be well understood.

If I had to suggest something, I would go with classes of primary metabolites. But I wouldn’t call that a strict technical term like functional group (organic chemistry) or species (taxonomy).

|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Adding on to what Jan mentioned I looked it up in a few of the well-known textbooks. (Emphasis mine.)

Alberts et al. Molecular Biology of the Cell 6ed, p47 writes

"four major families of small organic molecules"

Berg & Stryer Biochemistry 7ed, p2 is a bit more careful

[...] two different classes of molecules: large molecules such as proteins and nucleic acids, referred to as biological macromolecules, and low-molecular-weight molecules such as glucose and glyccerol, referred to as metabolites [...]

Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry 6ed, p15 writes

Many biological molecules are macromolecules... shorter polymers are called oligomers... Table 1-1 shows the major classes of biomolecules in an E. coli cell. [Entries in Table 1-1: Water, proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, lipids, monomeric subunits and intermediates, inorganic ions.]

Voet & Voet Biochemistry 4ed, p15 writes

[...] E. coli, and living things in general, contain only a few different types of macromolecules: proteins, [...] nucleic acids, and polysaccharides. [...] Lipids, the fourth major class of biological molecules, are too small to be classified as macromolecules but also have a modular construction.


Two weeks ago I suggested "classes of biomolecules" in my comment. In lieu of what I have quoted above, I think that might be a little bit imprecise since there are more types of biomolecules than simply those four classes. So, "major classes of biomolecules" would be a good idea.

|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.