Which is the electron configuration for $\ce{Cr^2+}$

(A) $\mathrm{[Ar]4s^23d^4}$
(B) $\mathrm{[Ar]4s^23d^2}$
(C) $\mathrm{[Ar]4s^03d^4}$
(D) $\mathrm{[Ar]4s^43d^2}$

I referred to the periodic table and got the orbital notation for $\ce{Cr}$ as $$\mathrm{[Ar]4s^23d^4}\tag1$$ So $\ce{Cr^2+}$ would be $\mathrm{[Ar]4s^23d^2}$, or (B). But the teacher counted that wrong and said it was actually (C).

Question: Shouldn't the answer be (B)? Why does $\ce{Cr}$ lose the $\mathrm{s}$ shell first?


1 Answer 1


Chromium’s standard electron configuration as given by the aufbau principle is actually more of an exception than you may think initially. See for example this question to catch a small glimpse of the truth behind the simplifications.

The aufbau principle tells you to fill in the order $\ce{1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p, 4s, 3d, 4p, }\dots$ That order, however, is only valid for neutral atoms (and not always as the linked question implies). As soon as you add charge to an atom, the relative orbital energies shift. The $\ce{3d}$ orbitals, belonging to the M shell, are stabilised more than the $\ce{4s}$ orbital which belongs to the N shell. This is a general rule: charges typically stabilise orbitals belonging to lower shells more than those in higher shells.

Thus, while in neutral chromium the $\ce{4s}$ and the $\ce{3d}$ shell are very close in energy, this balance completely tips towards $\ce{3d}$ (which then has a lower energy) upon oxidation. Therefore, one should always assume an empty $\ce{4s}$ orbital when discussing the electronic configuration of charged d-block elements.

  • $\begingroup$ Yup. I agree with this much more. Exchange energy, being a relatively small factor compared to orbital energies, should really always be the last-resort explanation when everything else doesn't work. And I once wrote a bit about the 3d vs 4s matter, so I'll dump this here: chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/33310/16683 $\endgroup$ Nov 15, 2016 at 23:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.