I've been reading about diastereoselective epoxidation of acyclic alkenes with VO(acac)2. This is taken from Carey, Sundberg Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B: enter image description here The OH and epoxide are syn. Then, while reading Smith's Organic Synthesis I've found this (the ratio of products is 5.6:1 in favor of the anti): enter image description here which is in contrary with the results from Carey, Sundberg. In an Evans lecture the syn stereoselectivity is explained while in this lecture the anti selectivity is explained. Apparently different sources give opposite selectivities. What is the true explanation here? Is the syn or anti selectivity predominant?

  • $\begingroup$ Have you looked at the classic Evans, Fu paper on directed reactions? I want to say it's in JOC. $\endgroup$ – Zhe Nov 5 '16 at 11:54
  • $\begingroup$ Seems like Carey and Sundberg were wrong. $\endgroup$ – RBW Nov 5 '16 at 12:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.