1
$\begingroup$

While studying the basics of chemical bonding, I've often come across the following statements: 1. The bond energy increases with the increase in the s-character in a hybrid orbital, i.e sp3 sp2-sp2, and so on.

I can't seem to correlate the two. If a hybrid has a higher bond energy, shouldn't it also form stronger bonds?

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Wildcat, Curt F., Michael DM Dryden, Todd Minehardt, Jon Custer Oct 2 '16 at 16:33

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "If a hybrid has a higher bond energy, shouldn't it also form stronger bonds?" Which statement contradicted this? $\endgroup$ – DHMO Oct 2 '16 at 10:35
  • $\begingroup$ @downvoter: why the downvote? Because this question is too elementary? $\endgroup$ – DHMO Oct 2 '16 at 10:37
  • $\begingroup$ I didn't downvote, but voted to close the question, since it is not quite clear to me what's it is all about. As @DHMO mentioned, there is no any contradiction out there. Still, I made an attempt to clear some doubts OP could possibly have, if I understand him/her correctly. $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Oct 2 '16 at 11:08
5
$\begingroup$

Let us start with the following most important part of the IUPAC definition for the bond energy.

bond energy (mean bond energy)

The average value of the gas-phase bond dissociation energies (usually at a temperature of 298 K) for all bonds of the same type within the same chemical species.

I think it should be immediately clear now that the higher a bond energy is, the stronger is the bond, so that there is no any contradiction in a bond energy increase with the increase of the $\mathrm{s}$-character in hybrid $\mathrm{sp}^n$-orbitals.

Indeed, $\mathrm{2s}$-orbitals are lower in energy that the $\mathrm{2p}$ ones, and thus, the more $\mathrm{s}$-character a hybrid orbital has, the lower is its energy: $E_{\mathrm{sp}} < E_{\mathrm{sp^2}} < E_{\mathrm{sp^3}}$. The lower an atomic or hybrid orbital energy is, the lower is the energy of a molecular orbital in formation of which it participates, $E_{\sigma_\mathrm{sp}} < E_{\sigma_\mathrm{sp^2}} < E_{\sigma_\mathrm{sp^3}}$, and consequently, the higher is the corresponding bond dissociation energy, as well as, the average of them, i.e. the bond energy. So, the bond energy indeed increases as the s-character grows, say $E_{\ce{C(\mathrm{sp})-C(\mathrm{sp})}} > E_{\ce{C(\mathrm{sp^2})-C(\mathrm{sp^2})}} > E_{\ce{C(\mathrm{sp^3})-C(\mathrm{sp^3})}}$.

Below is the MO diagram for $\sigma$ $\ce{C-C}$ bond between two $\mathrm{sp}$-, two $\mathrm{sp^2}$-, and two $\mathrm{sp^3}$-hydridized $\ce{C}$ atoms that illustrates the logic above. enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @DHMO: if the sp hybrid orbital is stronger than the sp3 orbital, why is the sp-sp bond weaker than the sp3-sp3 bond? $\endgroup$ – user35546 Oct 2 '16 at 13:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Kōhai, first note that orbitals aren't stronger/weaker relative to each other, but rather, they are lower/higher in energy. Now, the lower a bonding orbital is, the stronger is the corresponding bond. Finally, who told you that $\ce{C(\mathrm{sp})-C(\mathrm{sp})}$ bond is weaker than the $\ce{C(\mathrm{sp^3})-C(\mathrm{sp^3})}$ one? $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Oct 2 '16 at 14:25
  • $\begingroup$ A quick Google search results in 347–356 kJ/mol for bond-dissociation energy (at 298 K) for $\sigma$ $\ce{C(\mathrm{sp})-C(\mathrm{sp})}$ bond in alkanes and 837-839 kJ/mol for the triple bond in alkynes, out of which the $\sigma$ $\ce{C(\mathrm{sp^3})-C(\mathrm{sp^3})}$ bond contributes 369 kJ/mol. $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Oct 2 '16 at 14:30
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, just to ensure that I've understood this correctly, lower the hybrid orbital energy, higher is the dissociation energy of the bond it forms, right? I think I messed up between the energy and the bond energy. $\endgroup$ – user35546 Oct 2 '16 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Kōhai, yes, the lower a bonding orbital is, the more energy is required to break the bond. In our case the bonding orbital is formed from a hybrid orbital of C atom and some orbital of another atom X. And for a given orbital of atom X, the lower the hybrid orbital of C atom is, the lower a bonding orbital will be. I think I can try to draw this... $\endgroup$ – Wildcat Oct 2 '16 at 16:52