8
$\begingroup$

The values of the coefficient $b$ for helium and neon are

$$\begin{array}{cc} \hline \text{Element} & b\text{ / }\mathrm{dm^3\ mol^{-1}} \\ \hline \ce{He} & 2.38 \times 10^{-2} \\ \ce{Ne} & 1.67 \times 10^{-2} \\ \hline \end{array}$$ (source: Atkins & de Paula, Physical Chemistry, 9th ed., p 916)

This doesn't make sense, however, considering that neon should have a larger atomic radius than helium. Why is $b_\ce{He} > b_\ce{Ne}$?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
7
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It's a good question, but please, always include the units whenever you are discussing science! It may sound pedantic, but science is not science without units. $\endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Sep 27, 2016 at 5:50
  • $\begingroup$ I'm guessing charge-to-volume ratio. $\endgroup$
    – DHMO
    Sep 27, 2016 at 10:37
  • $\begingroup$ So you mean if the charge density is higher than the atom would be "tougher" and any particle would therefore bounce back immediately. $\endgroup$
    – Math The Novice
    Sep 27, 2016 at 11:57
  • $\begingroup$ What does that even mean, there is no charge on the atoms. $\endgroup$
    – orthocresol
    Sep 27, 2016 at 14:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I suspect this depends very heavily neon's full $2p$ orbital and how this affects the volume actually excluded by the atom. I'd also be skeptical of values you find for van der waal's radii unless you trust the method by which they're found because there are quite a few different ways to get a guess experimentally. $\endgroup$
    – jheindel
    Sep 29, 2016 at 2:54

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

The question intregues me so I looked up the $a$ and $b$ values in Wikipedia on the web page Van der Waals constants. This doesn't answer the question, but adds more data to focus the question.

$$\begin{array}{cc} \hline \text{Element} & a\text{ / }\mathrm{L^2 \ bar\ mol^{-2}} & b\text{ / }\mathrm{L\ mol^{-1}}\\ \hline \ce{He} & 0.0346 & 0.0238 \\ \ce{Ne} & 0.2135 & 0.01709 \\ \ce{Ar} & 1.355 & 0.03201 \\ \ce{Kr} & 2.349 & 0.03978 \\ \ce{Xe} & 4.250 & 0.05105\\ \ce{Rn} & 6.601 & 0.06239 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

A plot of the Van der Waals $a$ and $b$ values. enter image description here

So is the b value for He high, or is the b value for Ne low ?!?

I also looked up for each element what was listed for the covalent radius and the Van der Waals radius on each elements individual Wikipedia webpage.

$$\begin{array}{cc} \hline \text{Element} & Covalent\text{ (pm) } & Van~der~Waals \text{ (pm)}\\ \hline \ce{He} & 28 & 140 \\ \ce{Ne} & 58 & 154 \\ \ce{Ar} & 106±10 & 188 \\ \ce{Kr} & 116±4 & 202 \\ \ce{Xe} & 140±9 & 216 \\ \ce{Rn} & 150 & 220 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ So Is the b value for He high, or is the b value for Ne low ? $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Sep 27, 2016 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ What is the plot for ? $\endgroup$
    – Math The Novice
    Oct 5, 2016 at 4:46
  • $\begingroup$ @MathTheNovice - As the text indicates "A plot of the Van der Waals a and b values [for the six noble gases]." The gist is to look at the curve and decide if the He Or Ne value is out of whack for the trend. $\endgroup$
    – MaxW
    Oct 5, 2016 at 6:50
  • $\begingroup$ A coefficient stands for the intereaction between molecules while b for molecule volume (In the interpretation from physics ) and I don't really get how it is related though the plot show a significant correlation between them $\endgroup$
    – Math The Novice
    Oct 5, 2016 at 8:59
  • $\begingroup$ I mean is the straight line appeared by coincidence $\endgroup$
    – Math The Novice
    Oct 5, 2016 at 9:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.