4
$\begingroup$

Is the cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene (non-aromatic benzene) possible to make or will it destabilize (or should I say stabilize?) into benzene?

Cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene is alternative name of benzene better describing its hypothetical, non-aromatic version. However they are similar and I was wondering if you made cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene would the electrons delocalise to form benzene or not?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ but i thought benzene and cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene are the same! how are they different? $\endgroup$
    – Prakhar
    Dec 6 '16 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ @PrakharSankrityayan Edited it to be more clear. $\endgroup$
    – Mithoron
    Dec 6 '16 at 14:32
4
$\begingroup$

You cannot make (= synthesise) isolated, nonaromatic cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene[1] much like you cannot make (= synthesise) pseudoaromatic, biradicallic cyclobuta-1,3-diene. Hypothetical unsubstituted cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene will immediately give benzene, as this answer demonstrates.

The only way to actually generate nonaromatic cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene is to apply an intramolecular constraint that disallows the aromatization. Since cyclobuta-1,3-diene is the most obvious antiaromatic, planar system, that will attempt to always adopt a localised double bond structure, structure 1 below immediately suggests itself as a model system for the localised cyclotriene.

Synthesis of compound 1 by Diercks and Vollhardt
Scheme 1: Diercks’ and Vollhardt’s synthesis of a cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene system 1.

Indeed, that was the approach that Diercks and Vollhardt used to synthesise a model of cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene.[2] They report a crystal structure of 4 ($\ce{R}= \ce{TMS}$) wherein the alternating single and double bonds are clearly seen. The cyclobutyl sub-species adopts a cyclobutene-structure, meaning that the central cyclohexatriene ring’s double bonds are localised between the cyclobutane cores as indicated by the structure drawn. The outer benzyl rings are relatively aromatic (but not perfect hexagons).


Note and reference:

[1]: IUPAC nomenclature would allow systematically naming benzene as cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene. This is because IUPAC nomenclature assumes no knowledge of the chemistry of a given structure and requires names to be applicable ab initio and a priori. However, henceforth in this answer I shall make a distinction of (nonaromatic, localised, $D_\mathrm{3h}$-symmetric) cyclohexa-1,3,5-triene and (aromatic, $D_\mathrm{6h}$-symmetric) benzene.

[2]: R. Diercks, K. P. C. Vollhardt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3150. DOI: 10.1021/ja00271a080.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.